29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mind and material engagement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Material Engagement Theory (MET), which forms the focus of this special issue, is a relatively new development within cognitive archaeology and anthropology, but one that has important implications for many adjacent fields of research in phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. In How Things Shape the Mind (2013) I offered a detail exposition of the major working hypotheses and the vision of mind that it embodies. Here, introducing this special issue, more than just presenting a broad overview of MET, I seek to enrich and extend that vision and discuss its application to the study of mind and matter. I begin by laying out the philosophical roots, theoretical context and intellectual kinship of MET. Then I offer a basic outline of this theoretical framework focusing on the notions of thinging and metaplasticity. In the last part I am using the example of pottery making to illustrate how MET can be used to inform empirical research and how it might complement new research in phenomenology and embodied cognitive science.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cognitive ecology.

          Cognitive ecology is the study of cognitive phenomena in context. In particular, it points to the web of mutual dependence among the elements of a cognitive ecosystem. At least three fields were taking a deeply ecological approach to cognition 30 years ago: Gibson's ecological psychology, Bateson's ecology of mind, and Soviet cultural-historical activity theory. The ideas developed in those projects have now found a place in modern views of embodied, situated, distributed cognition. As cognitive theory continues to shift from units of analysis defined by inherent properties of the elements to units defined in terms of dynamic patterns of correlation across elements, the study of cognitive ecosystems will become an increasingly important part of cognitive science.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Technology is Society Made Durable

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition

              We distinguish between three philosophical views on the neuroscience of predictive models: predictive coding (associated with internal Bayesian models and prediction error minimization), predictive processing (associated with radical connectionism and ‘simple’ embodiment) and predictive engagement (associated with enactivist approaches to cognition). We examine the concept of active inference under each model and then ask how this concept informs discussions of social cognition. In this context we consider Frith and Friston’s proposal for a neural hermeneutics, and we explore the alternative model of enactivist hermeneutics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Lambros.malafouris@keble.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                Phenomenol Cogn Sci
                Phenomenol Cogn Sci
                Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1568-7759
                1572-8676
                1 December 2018
                1 December 2018
                2019
                : 18
                : 1
                : 1-17
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, GRID grid.4991.5, Keble College & Institute of Archaeology, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-4998
                Article
                9606
                10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7
                6713400
                31523220
                8f884e6a-73de-410f-ba27-69d1da4b3485
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601, Horizon 2020;
                Award ID: 771997
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000925, John Templeton Foundation;
                Award ID: 60652
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010347, Keble College, University of Oxford;
                Award ID: Small Research Grant
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature B.V. 2019

                material engagement theory,things,metaplasticity,pottery making,cognitive archaeology,enactivism

                Comments

                Comment on this article