3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      DISABILITY STATUS, FINANCIAL STRAIN, AND SUBJECTIVE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING FOR PEOPLE WITH LTSS NEEDS IN CALIFORNIA

      abstract
      , ,
      Innovation in Aging
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many people with needs for Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) are vulnerable to financial strain, a chronic economic stressor that may negatively affect a person’s well-being. This study examines the extent to which financial strain mediates the relationship between people’s disability status and subjective health and well-being, controlling for select demographic characteristics. Disability status refers to the intensity of disabilities that people report, including cognitive impairments, and/or difficulties performing activities of daily living and/or instrumental activities of daily living. Financial strain measures the number of challenges that participants incurred during the last year in acquiring food, housing, health care, and other basic needs. We use the first cycle of data (2019-2020) from the California Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) survey, merged with select data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) (N = 2,030). Drawing from Pearlin’s Stress Process Model, we use Conditional Process Analysis (CPA) to examine the hypothesized mediation relationships. Findings show that the intensity of disability status has a direct association with self-rated health (c’ = -.2054, p < .0001) and psychological distress (c’ = .7247, p < .0001). Furthermore, financial strain experienced by people with LTSS needs mediates the relationship between their disability status and 1) self-rated health (ab = -.0178, BootCI= -.0285 to -.0082) and 2) psychological distress (ab = 0.19, BootCI= .1323 to .2648). These results have policy and practice implications for national and state programs, such as Medicaid, the Universal Basic Income (UBI) program, and the Master Plan for Aging in California.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Innov Aging
          Innov Aging
          innovateage
          Innovation in Aging
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2399-5300
          November 2022
          20 December 2022
          20 December 2022
          : 6
          : Suppl 1 , Program Abstracts from The GSA 2022 Annual Scientific Meeting, “Embracing Our Diversity. Enriching Our Discovery. Reimagining Aging.”
          : 264
          Affiliations
          University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California, United States
          University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) , Los Angeles, California, United States
          University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) , Los Angeles, California, United States
          Article
          igac059.1047
          10.1093/geroni/igac059.1047
          9770178
          8f806396-17cf-4d0b-ad9b-57199a2b6247
          © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Session 3770 (Paper)
          Financial Security, Economics, Health, and Housing
          AcademicSubjects/SOC02600

          Comments

          Comment on this article