7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploratory Study Using Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds for the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) biomarkers are lacking in clinical practice. We therefore explored the pattern and composition of urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in HCC patients. This was done in order to assess the feasibility of a potential non-invasive test for HCC, and to enhance our understanding of the disease. This pilot study recruited 58 participants, of whom 20 were HCC cases and 38 were non-HCC cases. The non-HCC cases included healthy individuals and patients with various stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), including those with and without fibrosis. Urine was analysed using gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC–IMS) and gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC–TOF-MS). GC–IMS was able to separate HCC from fibrotic cases with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (0.91–1.00), and from non-fibrotic cases with an AUC of 0.62 (0.48–0.76). For GC-TOF-MS, a subset of samples was analysed in which seven chemicals were identified and tentatively linked with HCC. These include 4-methyl-2,4- bis( p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene (2TMS derivative), 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-, 3-butene-1,2-diol, 1-(2-furanyl)-, bicyclo(4.1.0)heptane, 3,7,7-trimethyl-, [1S-(1a,3β,6a)]-, and sulpiride. Urinary VOC analysis using both GC–IMS and GC-TOF-MS proved to be a feasible method of identifying HCC cases, and was also able to enhance our understanding of HCC pathogenesis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hepatocellular carcinoma

            Hepatocellular carcinoma appears frequently in patients with cirrhosis. Surveillance by biannual ultrasound is recommended for such patients because it allows diagnosis at an early stage, when effective therapies are feasible. The best candidates for resection are patients with a solitary tumour and preserved liver function. Liver transplantation benefits patients who are not good candidates for surgical resection, and the best candidates are those within Milan criteria (solitary tumour ≤5 cm or up to three nodules ≤3 cm). Image-guided ablation is the most frequently used therapeutic strategy, but its efficacy is limited by the size of the tumour and its localisation. Chemoembolisation has survival benefit in asymptomatic patients with multifocal disease without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. Finally, sorafenib, lenvatinib, which is non-inferior to sorafenib, and regorafenib increase survival and are the standard treatments in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This Seminar summarises the scientific evidence that supports the current recommendations for clinical practice, and discusses the areas in which more research is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Hepatocellular Carcinoma

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Molecules
                Molecules
                molecules
                Molecules
                MDPI
                1420-3049
                22 April 2021
                May 2021
                : 26
                : 9
                : 2447
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK; ayman.bannaga@ 123456warwick.ac.uk
                [2 ]Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7HL, UK
                [3 ]School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; heena.tyagi@ 123456warwick.ac.uk (H.T.); e.daulton@ 123456warwick.ac.uk (E.D.); j.a.covington@ 123456warwick.ac.uk (J.A.C.)
                [4 ]Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
                [5 ]Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: r.arasaradnam@ 123456warwick.ac.uk ; Tel.: +44-2476-966087
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-7864
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-6488
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-3062
                Article
                molecules-26-02447
                10.3390/molecules26092447
                8122735
                33922256
                8f5a1777-428f-43b0-9af5-f688ebb85c1b
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 March 2021
                : 20 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                urinary biomarkers,hepatocellular carcinoma,diagnosis,volatile organic compounds,headspace analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article