2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using Artificial Intelligence as a Diagnostic Decision Support Tool in Skin Disease: Protocol for an Observational Prospective Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Dermatological conditions are a relevant health problem. Each person has an average of 1.6 skin diseases per year, and consultations for skin pathology represent 20% of the total annual visits to primary care and around 35% are referred to a dermatology specialist. Machine learning (ML) models can be a good tool to help primary care professionals, as it can analyze and optimize complex sets of data. In addition, ML models are increasingly being applied to dermatology as a diagnostic decision support tool using image analysis, especially for skin cancer detection and classification.

          Objective

          This study aims to perform a prospective validation of an image analysis ML model as a diagnostic decision support tool for the diagnosis of dermatological conditions.

          Methods

          In this prospective study, 100 consecutive patients who visit a participant general practitioner (GP) with a skin problem in central Catalonia were recruited. Data collection was planned to last 7 months. Anonymized pictures of skin diseases were taken and introduced to the ML model interface (capable of screening for 44 different skin diseases), which returned the top 5 diagnoses by probability. The same image was also sent as a teledermatology consultation following the current stablished workflow. The GP, ML model, and dermatologist’s assessments will be compared to calculate the precision, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ML model. The results will be represented globally and individually for each skin disease class using a confusion matrix and one-versus-all methodology. The time taken to make the diagnosis will also be taken into consideration.

          Results

          Patient recruitment began in June 2021 and lasted for 5 months. Currently, all patients have been recruited and the images have been shown to the GPs and dermatologists. The analysis of the results has already started.

          Conclusions

          This study will provide information about ML models’ effectiveness and limitations. External testing is essential for regulating these diagnostic systems to deploy ML models in a primary care practice setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks

          Skin cancer, the most common human malignancy, is primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy and histopathological examination. Automated classification of skin lesions using images is a challenging task owing to the fine-grained variability in the appearance of skin lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for general and highly variable tasks across many fine-grained object categories. Here we demonstrate classification of skin lesions using a single CNN, trained end-to-end from images directly, using only pixels and disease labels as inputs. We train a CNN using a dataset of 129,450 clinical images—two orders of magnitude larger than previous datasets—consisting of 2,032 different diseases. We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical images with two critical binary classification use cases: keratinocyte carcinomas versus benign seborrheic keratoses; and malignant melanomas versus benign nevi. The first case represents the identification of the most common cancers, the second represents the identification of the deadliest skin cancer. The CNN achieves performance on par with all tested experts across both tasks, demonstrating an artificial intelligence capable of classifying skin cancer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists. Outfitted with deep neural networks, mobile devices can potentially extend the reach of dermatologists outside of the clinic. It is projected that 6.3 billion smartphone subscriptions will exist by the year 2021 (ref. 13) and can therefore potentially provide low-cost universal access to vital diagnostic care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists

            Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) may facilitate melanoma detection, but data comparing a CNN's diagnostic performance to larger groups of dermatologists are lacking.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases

              Skin conditions affect 1.9 billion people. Because of a shortage of dermatologists, most cases are seen instead by general practitioners with lower diagnostic accuracy. We present a deep learning system (DLS) to provide a differential diagnosis of skin conditions using 16,114 de-identified cases (photographs and clinical data) from a teledermatology practice serving 17 sites. The DLS distinguishes between 26 common skin conditions, representing 80% of cases seen in primary care, while also providing a secondary prediction covering 419 skin conditions. On 963 validation cases, where a rotating panel of three board-certified dermatologists defined the reference standard, the DLS was non-inferior to six other dermatologists and superior to six primary care physicians (PCPs) and six nurse practitioners (NPs) (top-1 accuracy: 0.66 DLS, 0.63 dermatologists, 0.44 PCPs and 0.40 NPs). These results highlight the potential of the DLS to assist general practitioners in diagnosing skin conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                August 2022
                31 August 2022
                : 11
                : 8
                : e37531
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Centre d'Atenció Primària Navàs-Balsareny Institut Català de la Salut Navàs Spain
                [2 ] Unitat de Suport a la Recerca de la Catalunya Central Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina Sant Fruitós de Bages Spain
                [3 ] Health Promotion in Rural Areas Research Group Gerència Territorial de la Catalunya Central Institut Català de la Salut Sant Fruitós de Bages Spain
                [4 ] iDoc24 Inc San Francisco, CA United States
                [5 ] Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
                [6 ] Dermatology Department Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [7 ] Fundació Althaia de Manresa Manresa Spain
                [8 ] Servei d’Atenció Primària Osona Gerència Territorial de Barcelona Institut Català de la Salut Vic Spain
                [9 ] Faculty of Medicine University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia Vic Spain
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Aïna Fuster-Casanovas afuster.cc.ics@ 123456gencat.cat
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-1871
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9128-9580
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7885-3455
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-3095
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-6030
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8750-3580
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6749-0468
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-4242
                Article
                v11i8e37531
                10.2196/37531
                9475422
                36044249
                8f33e2bc-cbd2-40df-aa80-72db009a30b9
                ©Anna Escalé-Besa, Aïna Fuster-Casanovas, Alexander Börve, Oriol Yélamos, Xavier Fustà-Novell, Mireia Esquius Rafat, Francesc X Marin-Gomez, Josep Vidal-Alaball. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.08.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 24 February 2022
                : 4 May 2022
                : 11 May 2022
                : 12 May 2022
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                machine learning,artificial intelligence,data accuracy,computer-assisted diagnosis,neural network computer,support tool,skin disease,cohort study,dermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article