8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recreational Athletes’ Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances: Results from the First European Randomized Response Technique Survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aim

          Measuring the prevalence of doping in recreational sport is difficult. However, to fit their initiatives, National Anti-Doping Organizations are interested in knowing the numbers, so their scarce resources are not wasted. The present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of doping and over-the-counter medicine use for performance enhancement among recreational athletes in eight European countries.

          Design

          A survey covering + 200 sports aimed at recreational athletes 15 years and older was distributed via social media to sports clubs and individuals in eight European countries. To overcome social desirability bias, we applied indirect questioning by using the Randomized Response Technique and asked for the use of over-the-counter medicine and doping for the year 2019.

          Results

          The prevalence of the use of over-the-counter medications for performance enhancement was estimated at 10.4%. We differentiated between the concept of “doping” as the behavior to enhance performance in a certain sport and the concept of “a doper” as a property of a person. The prevalence of dopers in recreational sport was found to be 0.4%, with 3.1% male and 0% female dopers. Responses were separated into four categories: “Artistic sports,” “Combat sports,” “Games,” and “CGS sports” (i.e., sports measured in centimeters, grams, and seconds). The overall prevalence of doping in recreational sports was found to be 1.6%, and the results from Artistic and CGS sports did not differ significantly from this. However, in Games we found an estimated doping prevalence of 6.9%.

          Discussion

          The estimates for the prevalence of dopers and doping in this study do not equal Anti-Doping Rule Violations as stipulated by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Still, while doping is not absent in recreational sport in Europe, it appears to be a low frequent phenomenon. Also, the differences in doping prevalence between the sports categories might reflect structural and competition-related differences, rather than differences in the logic of the sporting competition or discipline-related subcultures.

          Conclusion

          While few recreational athletes appear to use illegal drugs to enhance performance, those who do use them are more often men than women. Yet, 1 in 10 recreational athletes uses over-the-counter medication for performance enhancement and more than 4 out of 10 use medication for other reasons than performance enhancement when doing sports. The highest doping prevalence was found in the sub-category of Games, which can likely be attributed to competition-related differences between the categories. Therefore, research on doping in recreational sports needs tailored approaches to come to a better understanding of the phenomenon.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          An Introduction to the Bootstrap

          Statistics is a subject of many uses and surprisingly few effective practitioners. The traditional road to statistical knowledge is blocked, for most, by a formidable wall of mathematics. The approach in An Introduction to the Bootstrap avoids that wall. It arms scientists and engineers, as well as statisticians, with the computational techniques they need to analyze and understand complicated data sets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias.

            S L Warner (1965)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                avc@ph.au.dk
                m.frenger@mx.uni-saarland.de
                andrea.chirico@uniroma1.it
                we.pitsch@mx.uni-saarland.de
                Journal
                Sports Med Open
                Sports Med Open
                Sports Medicine - Open
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2199-1170
                2198-9761
                8 January 2023
                8 January 2023
                December 2023
                : 9
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7048.b, ISNI 0000 0001 1956 2722, Department of Public Health, , Aarhus University, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]GRID grid.11749.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2167 7588, Institute for Sport Science, , Saarland University, ; Saarbruecken, Germany
                [3 ]European Institute for Socioeconomy, Saarbruecken, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.7841.a, Department of Psychology of Development and Socialization Processes, , “Sapienza” University of Rome, ; Rome, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-6314
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-1959
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-1926
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-6873
                Article
                548
                10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2
                9825800
                36617340
                8eec9817-8935-4354-84d5-a78fedce0813
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 June 2022
                : 19 December 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                doping,recreational sport,prevalence,randomized response technique,europe,performance enhancement

                Comments

                Comment on this article