11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Venom immunotherapy and difficulties encountered before and during immunotherapy: Double sensitization, systemic reactions, treatment with omalizumab, and high dose VIT

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/aim

          Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the most effective treatment method to prevent recurrent systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings. In this study, the demographic characteristics of VIT patients, the success rates of VIT, the difficulties we encountered during VIT, and solutions for these difficulties in our clinic were presented.

          Materials and methods

          We retrospectively analyzed patients with venom allergy who applied venom immunotherapy between 2013–2020. Data on age, gender, Hymenoptera species with the first reaction, grade of the reaction, beekeeping history, skin prick and specific IgE and component results, double sensitization, blood groups, and reactions with VIT and/or sting during built-up and maintenance periods were recorded.

          Results

          A total of 73 patients were enrolled in the study. The median time from the first sting reaction to the application to the allergy outpatient clinic was 12 (0.5–24) months. The first sting reaction of 38 (52.1%) of the patients was with honey bees, and 24 (32.9%) were with wasps. Double positivity was present in 29 (40%) of the patients in prick results and 26 (36%) serologically. There was no correlation between the severity of first reactions and Apis Mellifera or Vespula prick diameters (p = 0.643; r = −0.056; p = 0.462; r = 0.089, respectively). High-dose VIT was administered to 4 patients. Omalizumab has been used as an alternative agent to achieve the maintenance dose in 2 patients with frequent systemic reactions during VIT.

          Conclusion

          Most patients were able to tolerate VIT. Double positivity is one of the most common difficulties before VIT. In patients who develop systemic reactions in the VIT maintenance phase, a maintenance dose increase should be considered in the maintenance phase. Adding omalizumab does not seem to be a permanent solution in patients who develop a severe systemic reaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: Hymenoptera venom allergy.

          Hymenoptera venom allergy is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction following a honeybee, vespid, or ant sting. Systemic-allergic sting reactions have been reported in up to 7.5% of adults and up to 3.4% of children. They can be mild and restricted to the skin or moderate to severe with a risk of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Patients should carry an emergency kit containing an adrenaline autoinjector, H1 -antihistamines, and corticosteroids depending on the severity of their previous sting reaction(s). The only treatment to prevent further systemic sting reactions is venom immunotherapy. This guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on Venom Immunotherapy as part of the EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy initiative. The guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of venom immunotherapy, has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis and produced using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included representation from a range of stakeholders. Venom immunotherapy is indicated in venom-allergic children and adults to prevent further moderate-to-severe systemic sting reactions. Venom immunotherapy is also recommended in adults with only generalized skin reactions as it results in significant improvements in quality of life compared to carrying an adrenaline autoinjector. This guideline aims to give practical advice on performing venom immunotherapy. Key sections cover general considerations before initiating venom immunotherapy, evidence-based clinical recommendations, risk factors for adverse events and for relapse of systemic sting reaction, and a summary of gaps in the evidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevention and treatment of hymenoptera venom allergy: guidelines for clinical practice.

            Based on the knowledge of the living conditions and habitat of social Aculeatae a series of recommendations have been formulated which can potentially greatly minimize the risk of field re-sting. After a systemic sting reaction, patients should be referred to an allergy specialist for evaluation of their allergy, and if necessary venom immunotherapy (VIT). An emergency medical kit should be supplied, its use clearly demonstrated and repeatedly practised until perfected. This should be done under the supervision of a doctor or a trained nurse. Epinephrine by intramuscular injection is regarded as the treatment of choice for acute anaphylaxis. H1-antihistamines alone or in combination with corticosteroids may be effective in mild to moderate reactions confined to the skin and may support the value of treatment with epinephrine in full-blown anaphylaxis. Up to 75% of the patients with a history of systemic anaphylactic sting reaction develop systemic symptoms once again when re-stung. Venom immunotherapy is a highly effective treatment for individuals with a history of systemic reaction and who have specific IgE to venom allergens. The efficacy of VIT in yellow jacket venom allergic patients has been demonstrated also by assessing health-related quality of life. If both skin tests and serum venom specific IgE turn negative, VIT may be stopped after 3 years. After VIT lasting 3-5 years, most patients with mild to moderate anaphylactic symptoms remain protected following discontinuation of VIT even with positive skin tests. Longer term or lifelong treatment should be considered in high-risk patients. Because of the small but relevant risk of re-sting reactions, in these patients, emergency kits, including epinephrine auto-injectors, should be discussed with every patient when stopping VIT.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS TO COLLOID VOLUME SUBSTITUTES

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Turk J Med Sci
                Turk J Med Sci
                Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
                Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
                1300-0144
                1303-6165
                2022
                10 April 2022
                : 52
                : 4
                : 1223-1234
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
                [2 ]Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
                [3 ]Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases Atatürk Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: drguldenp@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-3401
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6023-6291
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-2661
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-8489
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9143-5143
                Article
                turkjmedsci-52-4-1223
                10.55730/1300-0144.5427
                10387991
                36326412
                8e804c1c-7340-4687-b485-249f8ab8bf90
                © TÜBİTAK

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 17 September 2021
                : 10 August 2022
                : 10 April 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                allergy,venom immunotherapy,apis mellifera,vespula,double sensitization,omalizumab

                Comments

                Comment on this article