2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly important in seismology and earthquake science. Lab‐based studies have used acoustic emission data to predict time‐to‐failure and stress state, and in a few cases, the same approach has been used for field data. However, the underlying physical mechanisms that allow lab earthquake prediction and seismic forecasting remain poorly resolved. Here, we address this knowledge gap by coupling active‐source seismic data, which probe asperity‐scale processes, with ML methods. We show that elastic waves passing through the lab fault zone contain information that can predict the full spectrum of labquakes from slow slip instabilities to highly aperiodic events. The ML methods utilize systematic changes in P‐wave amplitude and velocity to accurately predict the timing and shear stress during labquakes. The ML predictions improve in accuracy closer to fault failure, demonstrating that the predictive power of the ultrasonic signals improves as the fault approaches failure. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between the ultrasonic parameters and fault slip rate, and in turn, the systematically evolving real area of contact and asperity stiffness allow the gradient boosting algorithm to “learn” about the state of the fault and its proximity to failure. Broadly, our results demonstrate the utility of physics‐informed ML in forecasting the imminence of fault slip at the laboratory scale, which may have important implications for earthquake mechanics in nature.

          Key Points

          • Machine learning (ML) can be used on P‐wave amplitude and velocity to predict the timing and shear stress evolution of laboratory earthquakes

          • The ability of the ML algorithm to predict time‐to‐failure improves as the fault approaches failure

          • Predictions rely on the systematic reduction in elastic properties prior to failure, which is linked to a reduction in the real area of contact

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                srisharan@utexas.edu
                Journal
                J Geophys Res Solid Earth
                J Geophys Res Solid Earth
                10.1002/(ISSN)2169-9356
                JGRB
                Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2169-9313
                2169-9356
                19 July 2021
                July 2021
                : 126
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/jgrb.v126.7 )
                : e2020JB021588
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park USA
                [ 2 ] Now at The University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Austin USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics Pennsylvania State University University Park USA
                [ 4 ] Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra La Sapienza Università di Roma Italy
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to:

                S. Shreedharan,

                srisharan@ 123456utexas.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-8739
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-1743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-4500
                Article
                JGRB55055 2020JB021588
                10.1029/2020JB021588
                9285915
                35865235
                8dfa2448-9e5d-405a-8858-be3beec63bfd
                © 2021. The Authors.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 30 May 2021
                : 20 December 2020
                : 24 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 0, Pages: 18, Words: 9682
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council
                Award ID: 835012
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) , doi 10.13039/100000015;
                Award ID: DE‐SC0020512
                Award ID: DE‐EE0008763
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) , doi 10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: EAR 1520760
                Award ID: EAR 1547441
                Award ID: EAR 1763305
                Categories
                Machine learning for Solid Earth observation, modeling and understanding
                Natural Hazards
                Precursors
                Structural Geology
                Dynamics and Mechanics of Faulting
                Fractures and Faults
                Structural Geology
                Rheology and Friction of Fault Zones
                Tectonophysics
                Rheology and Friction of Fault Zones
                Stresses: Crust and Lithosphere
                Tectonophysics
                Dynamics and Mechanics of Faulting
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Chemistry and Physics of Minerals and Rocks/Volcanology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:15.07.2022

                friction,gradient boosted trees,machine learning,slow earthquakes,stick‐slips,xgboost

                Comments

                Comment on this article