1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective Comparison Between Shotgun Metagenomics and Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for the Etiological Diagnosis of Infections

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bacteriological diagnosis is traditionally based on culture. However, this method may be limited by the difficulty of cultivating certain species or by prior exposure to antibiotics, which justifies the resort to molecular methods, such as Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (Sanger 16S). Recently, shotgun metagenomics (SMg) has emerged as a powerful tool to identify a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms in numerous clinical contexts. In this study, we compared the performance of SMg to Sanger 16S for bacterial detection and identification. All patients’ samples for which Sanger 16S was requested between November 2019 and April 2020 in our institution were prospectively included. The corresponding samples were tested with a commercial 16S semi-automated method and a semi-quantitative pan-microorganism DNA- and RNA-based SMg method. Sixty-seven samples from 64 patients were analyzed. Overall, SMg was able to identify a bacterial etiology in 46.3% of cases (31/67) vs. 38.8% (26/67) with Sanger 16S. This difference reached significance when only the results obtained at the species level were compared (28/67 vs. 13/67). This study provides one of the first evidence of a significantly better performance of SMg than Sanger 16S for bacterial detection at the species level in patients with infectious diseases for whom culture-based methods have failed. This technology has the potential to replace Sanger 16S in routine practice for infectious disease diagnosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences.

          Publicly available sequence databases of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, also known as 16S rRNA in bacteria and archaea, are growing rapidly, and the number of entries currently exceeds 4 million. However, a unified classification and nomenclature framework for all bacteria and archaea does not yet exist. In this Analysis article, we propose rational taxonomic boundaries for high taxa of bacteria and archaea on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence identities and suggest a rationale for the circumscription of uncultured taxa that is compatible with the taxonomy of cultured bacteria and archaea. Our analyses show that only nearly complete 16S rRNA sequences give accurate measures of taxonomic diversity. In addition, our analyses suggest that most of the 16S rRNA sequences of the high taxa will be discovered in environmental surveys by the end of the current decade.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing When Applied to Clinical Practice

            Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was suggested to potentially replace traditional microbiological methodology because of its comprehensiveness. However, clinical experience with application of the test is relatively limited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis

              BACKGROUND Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has the potential to identify a broad range of pathogens in a single test. METHODS In a 1-year, multicenter, prospective study, we investigated the usefulness of metagenomic NGS of CSF for the diagnosis of infectious meningitis and encephalitis in hospitalized patients. All positive tests for pathogens on metagenomic NGS were confirmed by orthogonal laboratory testing. Physician feedback was elicited by teleconferences with a clinical microbial sequencing board and by surveys. Clinical effect was evaluated by retrospective chart review. RESULTS We enrolled 204 pediatric and adult patients at eight hospitals. Patients were severely ill: 48.5% had been admitted to the intensive care unit, and the 30-day mortality among all study patients was 11.3%. A total of 58 infections of the nervous system were diagnosed in 57 patients (27.9%). Among these 58 infections, metagenomic NGS identified 13 (22%) that were not identified by clinical testing at the source hospital. Among the remaining 45 infections (78%), metagenomic NGS made concurrent diagnoses in 19. Of the 26 infections not identified by metagenomic NGS, 11 were diagnosed by serologic testing only, 7 were diagnosed from tissue samples other than CSF, and 8 were negative on metagenomic NGS owing to low titers of pathogens in CSF. A total of 8 of 13 diagnoses made solely by metagenomic NGS had a likely clinical effect, with 7 of 13 guiding treatment. CONCLUSIONS Routine microbiologic testing is often insufficient to detect all neuroinvasive pathogens. In this study, metagenomic NGS of CSF obtained from patients with meningitis or encephalitis improved diagnosis of neurologic infections and provided actionable information in some cases. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; PDAID ClinicalTrials.gov number, [Related object:] .)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Microbiol
                Front Microbiol
                Front. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-302X
                06 April 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 761873
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Microbiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Prevention and Treatment of Infections, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris-Est-Créteil , Créteil, France
                [2] 2Department of Bacteriology, Virology, Hospital Hygiene, and Parasitology-Mycology, Brest University Hospital , Brest, France
                [3] 3Univ Brest, INSERM, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB , Brest, France
                [4] 4GHU AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Saint-Antoine , Paris, France
                [5] 5INSERM U955, IMRB Institute, University of Paris-Est Créteil , Créteil, France
                [6] 6EA 7380 Dynamyc, EnvA, UPEC, University of Paris-Est Créteil , Créteil, France
                [7] 7NGS Platform, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, and IMRB Institute, University of Paris-Est-Créteil , Créteil, France
                [8] 8Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, Diagnostic, Prevention and Treatment of Infections Department, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris-Est-Créteil , Créteil, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Silvia Turroni, University of Bologna, Italy

                Reviewed by: Marko Verce, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium; Laure Flurin, Mayo Clinic, United States; Erley Ferlipe Lizarazo, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Paul-Louis Woerther, paul-louis.woerther@ 123456aphp.fr

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Infectious Agents and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

                Article
                10.3389/fmicb.2022.761873
                9020828
                35464955
                8dd818f6-e504-4ae8-9228-dccfa03a1e54
                Copyright © 2022 Lamoureux, Surgers, Fihman, Gricourt, Demontant, Trawinski, N’Debi, Gomart, Royer, Launay, Le Glaunec, Wemmert, La Martire, Rossi, Lepeule, Pawlotsky, Rodriguez and Woerther.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 August 2021
                : 14 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 39, Pages: 9, Words: 6719
                Categories
                Microbiology
                Original Research

                Microbiology & Virology
                shotgun metagenomics,molecular diagnostic,pathogen identification,sanger sequencing of the 16s rrna gene,microbial documentation

                Comments

                Comment on this article