Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not

      review-article
      1 , 2 , * ,
      Evolutionary Human Sciences
      Cambridge University Press
      Austroasiatic, Japanese, Munda, population genetics, ethnolinguistic prehistory

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Over two decades ago, it was observed that the linguistic affinity of the language spoken by a particular population tended to correlate with the predominant paternal, i.e. Y-chromosomal, lineage found in that population. Such correlations were found to be ubiquitous but not universal, and the striking exceptions to such conspicuous patterns of correlation between linguistic and genetic phylogeography elicit particular interest and beg for clarification. Within the Austroasiatic language family, the Munda languages are a clear-cut case of father tongues, whereas Japanese and Korean are manifestly not. In this study, the cases of Munda and Japanese are juxtaposed. A holistic understanding of these contrasting cases of ethnolinguistic prehistory with respect to the father tongue correlation will first necessitate a brief exposition of the phylogeography of the Y chromosomal lineage O. Then triangulation discloses some contours and particulars of both long lost episodes of ethnolinguistic prehistory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references142

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture

          It is commonly thought that human genetic diversity in non-African populations was shaped primarily by an out-of-Africa dispersal 50–100 thousand yr ago (kya). Here, we present a study of 456 geographically diverse high-coverage Y chromosome sequences, including 299 newly reported samples. Applying ancient DNA calibration, we date the Y-chromosomal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) in Africa at 254 (95% CI 192–307) kya and detect a cluster of major non-African founder haplogroups in a narrow time interval at 47–52 kya, consistent with a rapid initial colonization model of Eurasia and Oceania after the out-of-Africa bottleneck. In contrast to demographic reconstructions based on mtDNA, we infer a second strong bottleneck in Y-chromosome lineages dating to the last 10 ky. We hypothesize that this bottleneck is caused by cultural changes affecting variance of reproductive success among males.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences.

              We report the sequences of 1,244 human Y chromosomes randomly ascertained from 26 worldwide populations by the 1000 Genomes Project. We discovered more than 65,000 variants, including single-nucleotide variants, multiple-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, short tandem repeats, and copy number variants. Of these, copy number variants contribute the greatest predicted functional impact. We constructed a calibrated phylogenetic tree on the basis of binary single-nucleotide variants and projected the more complex variants onto it, estimating the number of mutations for each class. Our phylogeny shows bursts of extreme expansion in male numbers that have occurred independently among each of the five continental superpopulations examined, at times of known migrations and technological innovations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Evol Hum Sci
                Evol Hum Sci
                EHS
                Evolutionary Human Sciences
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2513-843X
                2020
                29 May 2020
                : 2
                : e19
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Zoology, Benaras Hindu University , Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India
                [2 ]Linguistics Institute, University of Bern , Länggassstrasse 49, CH 3012 Bern, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. E-mail: vandriem@ 123456isw.unibe.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-0657
                Article
                S2513843X20000146
                10.1017/ehs.2020.14
                10427457
                8dcfd5b1-0782-4f3f-8b8a-0df2a0dd378c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, References: 138, Pages: 17
                Categories
                Review

                austroasiatic,japanese,munda,population genetics,ethnolinguistic prehistory

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content306

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors1,848