4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demonstrate the efficacy of PPs‐RFs before illustrating how they become especially useful when limited data is available in typical planetary missions. Using a transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian deconvolution approach, we compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐ and PPs‐RFs with InSight recordings of five marsquakes. Our Ps‐RF results verify the direct Ps converted phases reported by previous RF analyses with increased coherence and reveal other phases including the primary multiple reverberating within the uppermost layer of the Martian crust. Unlike the Ps‐RFs, our PPs‐RFs lack an arrival at 7.2 s lag time. Whereas Ps‐RFs on Mars could be equally well fit by a two‐ or three‐layer crust, synthetic modeling shows that the disappearance of the 7.2 s phase requires a three‐layer crust, and is highly sensitive to velocity and thickness of intra‐crustal layers. We show that a three‐layer crust is also preferred by S‐to‐P (Sp)‐RFs. While the deepest interface of the three‐layer crust represents the crust‐mantle interface beneath the InSight landing site, the other two interfaces at shallower depths could represent a sharp transition between either fractured and unfractured materials or thick basaltic flows and pre‐existing crustal materials. PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints and maximize the extraction of information about crustal structure in data‐constrained circumstances such as planetary missions.

          Key Points

          • We compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐, P‐waves (PPs)‐, and S‐to‐P (Sp)‐receiver functions (RFs) to infer properties of the crustal layers beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia

          • Sp‐RFs as well as observed variability of the 7.2 s phase between Ps‐ and PPs‐RFs require a three‐layer crust

          • PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints for crustal imaging on Earth and other planetary bodies

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The global topography of Mars and implications for surface evolution.

            Elevations measured by the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter have yielded a high-accuracy global map of the topography of Mars. Dominant features include the low northern hemisphere, the Tharsis province, and the Hellas impact basin. The northern hemisphere depression is primarily a long-wavelength effect that has been shaped by an internal mechanism. The topography of Tharsis consists of two broad rises. Material excavated from Hellas contributes to the high elevation of the southern hemisphere and to the scarp along the hemispheric boundary. The present topography has three major drainage centers, with the northern lowlands being the largest. The two polar cap volumes yield an upper limit of the present surface water inventory of 3.2 to 4.7 million cubic kilometers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The crust of the Moon as seen by GRAIL.

              High-resolution gravity data obtained from the dual Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) spacecraft show that the bulk density of the Moon's highlands crust is 2550 kilograms per cubic meter, substantially lower than generally assumed. When combined with remote sensing and sample data, this density implies an average crustal porosity of 12% to depths of at least a few kilometers. Lateral variations in crustal porosity correlate with the largest impact basins, whereas lateral variations in crustal density correlate with crustal composition. The low-bulk crustal density allows construction of a global crustal thickness model that satisfies the Apollo seismic constraints, and with an average crustal thickness between 34 and 43 kilometers, the bulk refractory element composition of the Moon is not required to be enriched with respect to that of Earth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dk696@cornell.edu
                Journal
                J Geophys Res Planets
                J Geophys Res Planets
                10.1002/(ISSN)2169-9100
                JGRE
                Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2169-9097
                2169-9100
                02 November 2021
                November 2021
                : 126
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/jgre.v126.11 )
                : e2021JE006983
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Geology University of Maryland College Park College Park MD USA
                [ 2 ] Institute of Geophysics ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland
                [ 3 ] School of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK
                [ 4 ] Bensberg Observatory University of Cologne Cologne Germany
                [ 5 ] Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research Göttingen Germany
                [ 6 ] Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
                [ 7 ] Université de Lyon UCBL ENSL CNRS LGL‐TPE Villeurbanne France
                [ 8 ] Research School of Earth Sciences Australian National University Acton ACT Australia
                [ 9 ] Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Bologna Bologna Italy
                [ 10 ] Department of Computational Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA
                [ 11 ] Department of Physics New Mexico State University Las Cruces NM USA
                [ 12 ] Université Côte d'Azur Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur CNRS Laboratoire Lagrange Nice France
                [ 13 ] Université de Paris Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris CNRS Paris France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to:

                D. Kim,

                dk696@ 123456cornell.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-2336
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-272X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-8246
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-1262
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-6785
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-4199
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-3190
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4304
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-5900
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0822-8849
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-5159
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-6850
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-3173
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-7638
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-4222
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-920X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-1542
                Article
                JGRE21764 2021JE006983
                10.1029/2021JE006983
                8597591
                8d928d2f-b9aa-4e64-9107-0946750b1322
                © 2021. The Authors.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 October 2021
                : 29 June 2021
                : 12 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 19, Words: 11157
                Funding
                Funded by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) , doi 10.13039/100000104;
                Award ID: 80NSSC18K1633
                Funded by: David and Lucile Packard Foundation (PF) , doi 10.13039/100000008;
                Funded by: ETHZ
                Funded by: UK Space Agency; , doi 10.13039/100011690;
                Funded by: NSF , doi 10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: EAR‐1736046
                Categories
                Geodesy and Gravity
                Earth's Interior: Composition and State
                Earth's Interior: Dynamics
                Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism
                Core Processes
                Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets
                Interiors
                Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets
                Interiors
                Planetary Sciences: Comets and Small Bodies
                Interiors
                Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects
                Mars
                Seismology
                Body Waves
                Core
                Seismology
                Mantle
                Tectonophysics
                Planetary Interiors
                Tectonophysics
                Continental Margins: Divergent
                Core Processes
                Dynamics of Lithosphere and Mantle: General
                Earth's Interior: Composition and State
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:17.11.2021

                insight,seismology,receiver function,mars,martian crust,transdimensional hierarchical bayesian

                Comments

                Comment on this article