16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Too much policing: Why calls are made to defund the police

      1 , 2
      Punishment & Society
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The repeat use of fatal force against unarmed people of color has driven global protests against police violence and fueled criticism of policing as a mechanism for public safety. In the US, calls to abolish, transform, or reform policing have reemerged with a primary focus on the elimination of structural racism. In this essay, we contend that a two-tier policing problem exists. The first is the continued use of policing to enforce racial dominance through policing practices labeled as “proactive”. The second is contemporary “warrior-style” police training that normalizes the expectation of unquestioned compliance with police directives and authorizes police to use physical force in its absence. This dangerous combination results in over-policing the public generally and Black members of the public specifically. Select incidents are provided to support these claims. We conclude by expressing support for the call to reallocate portions of policing budgets toward other government and community-based structures that function to enhance the ability of people to survive and thrive rather than operate as mechanisms of pre-adjudication punishment and state-sanctioned coercion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Mark of a Criminal Record

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.

            It is hypothesized that collective efficacy, defined as social cohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good, is linked to reduced violence. This hypothesis was tested on a 1995 survey of 8782 residents of 343 neighborhoods in Chicago, Illinois. Multilevel analyses showed that a measure of collective efficacy yields a high between-neighborhood reliability and is negatively associated with variations in violence, when individual-level characteristics, measurement error, and prior violence are controlled. Associations of concentrated disadvantage and residential instability with violence are largely mediated by collective efficacy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Whiteness as Property

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Punishment & Society
                Punishment & Society
                SAGE Publications
                1462-4745
                1741-3095
                October 22 2021
                : 146247452110456
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
                [2 ]Department of Sociology and Criminology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
                Article
                10.1177/14624745211045652
                8d6d7e4e-74ca-422e-93aa-47c94335c7c9
                © 2021

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article