4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictive Model of the Risk of In-Hospital Mortality in Colorectal Cancer Surgery, Based on the Minimum Basic Data Set

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Various models have been proposed to predict mortality rates for hospital patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. However, none have been developed in Spain using clinical administrative databases and none are based exclusively on the variables available upon admission. Our study aim is to detect factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer and, on this basis, to generate a predictive mortality score. Methods: A population cohort for analysis was obtained as all hospital admissions for colorectal cancer during the period 2008–2014, according to the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set. The main measure was actual and expected mortality after the application of the considered mathematical model. A logistic regression model and a mortality score were created, and internal validation was performed. Results: 115,841 hospitalization episodes were studied. Of these, 80% were included in the training set. The variables associated with in-hospital mortality were age (OR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.05–1.06), urgent admission (OR: 4.68, 95% CI: 4.36–5.02), pulmonary disease (OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.28–1.60), stroke (OR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.53–2.29) and renal insufficiency (OR: 7.26, 95%CI: 6.65–7.94). The level of discrimination (area under the curve) was 0.83. Conclusions: This mortality model is the first to be based on administrative clinical databases and hospitalization episodes. The model achieves a moderate–high level of discrimination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.

          POSSUM, a Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity, is described. This system has been devised from both a retrospective and prospective analysis and the present paper attempts to validate it prospectively. Logistic regression analysis yielded statistically significant equations for both mortality and morbidity (P less than 0.001). When displayed graphically zones of increasing morbidity and mortality rates could be defined which could be of value in surgical audit. The scoring system produced assessments for morbidity and mortality rates which did not significantly differ from observed rates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study.

            Better knowledge of independent risk factors might decrease mortality and morbidity rates following colorectal surgery. Prospective multicenter study. From June to September 2002, consecutive patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery (electively or on an emergent basis) for colorectal cancers or diverticular disease were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were colectomy for other causes (eg, inflammatory bowel diseases, benign polyps). The structured sheet of data collection included more than 200 items on all perioperative data concerning the patient, the disease, and the operating surgeons. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were defined as in-hospital death and complications. Among 1421 patients, the in-hospital death rate was 3.4% and the overall morbidity rate was 35%. Four independent preoperative risk factors of mortality were found: emergency surgery, loss of more than 10% of weight, neurological comorbidity, and age older than 70 years. Six independent risk factors of morbidity were found: age older than 70 years, neurologic comorbidity, hypoalbuminemia, cardiorespiratory comorbidity, long duration of operation, and peritoneal contamination. Colorectal resection in France is associated with a 3.4% mortality rate and a 35% morbidity rate. Knowledge of the risk factors could help surgeons manage cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models.

              To compare risk prediction models for death in hospital based on an administrative database with published results based on data derived from three national clinical databases: the national cardiac surgical database, the national vascular database and the colorectal cancer study. Analysis of inpatient hospital episode statistics. Predictive model developed using multiple logistic regression. NHS hospital trusts in England. All patients admitted to an NHS hospital within England for isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and colorectal excision for cancer from 1996-7 to 2003-4. Deaths in hospital. Performance of models assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve scores measuring discrimination ( 0.8=good) and both Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and standardised residuals measuring goodness of fit. During the study period 152 523 cases of isolated CABG with 3247 deaths in hospital (2.1%), 12 781 repairs of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (5987 deaths, 46.8%), 31 705 repairs of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (3246 deaths, 10.2%), and 144,370 colorectal resections for cancer (10,424 deaths, 7.2%) were recorded. The power of the complex predictive model was comparable with that of models based on clinical datasets with ROC curve scores of 0.77 (v 0.78 from clinical database) for isolated CABG, 0.66 (v 0.65) and 0.74 (v 0.70) for repairs of ruptured and unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, respectively, and 0.80 (v 0.78) for colorectal excision for cancer. Calibration plots generally showed good agreement between observed and predicted mortality. Routinely collected administrative data can be used to predict risk with similar discrimination to clinical databases. The creative use of such data to adjust for case mix would be useful for monitoring healthcare performance and could usefully complement clinical databases. Further work on other procedures and diagnoses could result in a suite of models for performance adjusted for case mix for a range of specialties and procedures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                12 June 2020
                June 2020
                : 17
                : 12
                : 4216
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain
                [2 ]Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain; miguel.rodriguez.barranco.easp@ 123456juntadeandalucia.es (M.R.-B.); mariajose.sanchez.easp@ 123456juntadeandalucia.es (M.-J.S.)
                [3 ]CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIEBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Fundación FIBAO, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain; molvera@ 123456fibao.es
                [5 ]Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain; manuferrer78@ 123456hotmail.com (M.F.-M.); cirujafrancis@ 123456hotmail.com (F.R.-G.)
                [6 ]Fundación FIBAO, Hospital Universitario de Jaén, 23007 Jaén, Spain; crosa@ 123456fibao.es
                [7 ]Registro de Cáncer de Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain
                [8 ]Empresa Pública Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, 04700 Almería, Spain; maru31es@ 123456yahoo.es
                [9 ]Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-5899
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-064X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-9252
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4677-2199
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-9779
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4817-0757
                Article
                ijerph-17-04216
                10.3390/ijerph17124216
                7344523
                32545670
                8d6072c9-8dca-4258-a048-9731288ee7c0
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 April 2020
                : 10 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                predictive model,colorectal cancer,epidemiology,public health,mortality
                Public health
                predictive model, colorectal cancer, epidemiology, public health, mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article