0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A comparative analysis of the mutagenicity of platinum-containing chemotherapeutic agents reveals direct and indirect mutagenic mechanisms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Platinum-based drugs are a mainstay of cancer chemotherapy. However, their mutagenic effect can increase tumour heterogeneity, contribute to the evolution of treatment resistance and also induce secondary malignancies. We coupled whole genome sequencing with phenotypic investigations on two cell line models to compare the magnitude and examine the mechanism of mutagenicity of cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin. Cisplatin induced significantly more base substitution mutations than carboplatin or oxaliplatin when used at equitoxic concentrations on human TK6 or chicken DT40 cells, and also induced the highest number of short insertions and deletions. The analysis of base substitution spectra revealed that all three tested platinum drugs elicit both a direct mutagenic effect at purine dinucleotides, and an indirect effect of accelerating endogenous mutagenic processes, whereas the direct mutagenic effect appeared to correlate with the level of DNA damage caused as assessed through histone H2AX phosphorylation and single-cell agarose gel electrophoresis, the indirect mutagenic effects were equal. The different mutagenicity and DNA-damaging effect of equitoxic platinum drug treatments suggest that DNA damage independent mechanisms significantly contribute to their cytotoxicity. Thus, the comparatively high mutagenicity of cisplatin should be taken into account in the design of chemotherapeutic regimens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer

          Somatic mutations in cancer genomes are caused by multiple mutational processes, each of which generates a characteristic mutational signature 1 . Here, as part of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium 2 of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we characterized mutational signatures using 84,729,690 somatic mutations from 4,645 whole-genome and 19,184 exome sequences that encompass most types of cancer. We identified 49 single-base-substitution, 11 doublet-base-substitution, 4 clustered-base-substitution and 17 small insertion-and-deletion signatures. The substantial size of our dataset, compared with previous analyses 3–15 , enabled the discovery of new signatures, the separation of overlapping signatures and the decomposition of signatures into components that may represent associated—but distinct—DNA damage, repair and/or replication mechanisms. By estimating the contribution of each signature to the mutational catalogues of individual cancer genomes, we revealed associations of signatures to exogenous or endogenous exposures, as well as to defective DNA-maintenance processes. However, many signatures are of unknown cause. This analysis provides a systematic perspective on the repertoire of mutational processes that contribute to the development of human cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance.

            Platinum-based drugs, and in particular cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (best known as cisplatin), are employed for the treatment of a wide array of solid malignancies, including testicular, ovarian, head and neck, colorectal, bladder and lung cancers. Cisplatin exerts anticancer effects via multiple mechanisms, yet its most prominent (and best understood) mode of action involves the generation of DNA lesions followed by the activation of the DNA damage response and the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis. Despite a consistent rate of initial responses, cisplatin treatment often results in the development of chemoresistance, leading to therapeutic failure. An intense research has been conducted during the past 30 years and several mechanisms that account for the cisplatin-resistant phenotype of tumor cells have been described. Here, we provide a systematic discussion of these mechanism by classifying them in alterations (1) that involve steps preceding the binding of cisplatin to DNA (pre-target resistance), (2) that directly relate to DNA-cisplatin adducts (on-target resistance), (3) concerning the lethal signaling pathway(s) elicited by cisplatin-mediated DNA damage (post-target resistance) and (4) affecting molecular circuitries that do not present obvious links with cisplatin-elicited signals (off-target resistance). As in some clinical settings cisplatin constitutes the major therapeutic option, the development of chemosensitization strategies constitute a goal with important clinical implications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy.

              The accidental discovery of the anticancer properties of cisplatin and its clinical introduction in the 1970s represent a major landmark in the history of successful anticancer drugs. Although carboplatin--a second-generation analogue that is safer but shows a similar spectrum of activity to cisplatin--was introduced in the 1980s, the pace of further improvements slowed for many years. However, in the past several years interest in platinum drugs has increased. Key developments include the elucidation of mechanisms of tumour resistance to these drugs, the introduction of new platinum-based agents (oxaliplatin, satraplatin and picoplatin), and clinical combination studies using platinum drugs with resistance modulators or new molecularly targeted drugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Mutagenesis
                Mutagenesis
                mutage
                Mutagenesis
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                0267-8357
                1464-3804
                January 2021
                27 January 2021
                27 January 2021
                : 36
                : 1 , SPECIAL TOPIC: Validation and Use of Genotoxicity Assays Based on Reconstructed Human Skin
                : 75-86
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences , Budapest, Hungary
                [2 ] Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute , London, UK
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +36 1 3826708; Email: szuts.david@ 123456ttk.hu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7985-0136
                Article
                geab005
                10.1093/mutage/geab005
                8081379
                33502495
                8d5fb1c0-ee31-4c1b-8f7d-a2b6b68e9d9a
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 11 January 2021
                : 19 January 2021
                : 18 March 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary;
                Award ID: PD_121381
                Award ID: K_124881
                Award ID: FIEK_16-1-2016-0005
                Funded by: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, DOI 10.13039/501100003825;
                Award ID: KEP-9/2019
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK, DOI 10.13039/501100000289;
                Award ID: FC001169
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: FC001169
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, DOI 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: FC001169
                Funded by: NovoNordisk Foundation;
                Award ID: ID16584
                Funded by: Royal Society Professorship Enhancement;
                Award ID: RP/EA/180007
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research, DOI 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: Cancer-LUNGevity-American Lung Association Lung Cancer Interception Dream Team Translational Research;
                Award ID: SU2C-AACR-DT23-17
                Funded by: European Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100000781;
                Award ID: FP7/2007–2013
                Award ID: FP7-THESEUS-617844
                Award ID: 835297
                Award ID: 665233
                Categories
                Regular Articles
                Original Manuscripts
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01140
                AcademicSubjects/MED00305

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article