6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      NORMAS DE CONSTITUCIÓN, NORMAS DE LEY: UNA RESPUESTA IMPROBABLE A LA LUZ DEL CASO CHILENO Translated title: CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS, LEGAL NORMS: AN IMPROBABLE ANSWER IN LIGHT OF THE CHILEAN CASE

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Uno de los debates transversales que generó la propuesta de nueva Constitución ofrecida por la Convención Constitucional - rechazada, luego, por el pueblo - fue el relativo a las materias que deberían incluirse en una Constitución y cuáles, en cambio, dejadas a la ley (u otras fuentes normativas). Este trabajo tiene por objetivo ordenar los argumentos a partir de los que se formulaban esas objeciones. Se dividen en cuatro razones. La primera de ellas arranca de una cierta expectativa o concepción respecto de la función de las constituciones. La segunda reposa en una visión sobre la forma en que las constituciones podrían alentar o menoscabar la democracia al transferir poderes de decisión a instituciones no representativas. La tercera reclama una supuesta infracción a la experiencia constitucional acumulada globalmente. La cuarta, y última, se formula desde una cierta cultura social y/o nacional que debe respetarse. Cada uno de esos criterios será sometido a escrutinio con razones que, desde luego - así como los mismos criterios -, encuentran eco en la literatura especializada.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract One of the cross-cutting debates generated by the proposal for a new Constitution offered by the Constitutional Convention - later rejected by the people -, was the question of which matters should be included in a Constitution and which, on the other hand, should be left to the law (or other normative sources). The purpose of this paper is to sort out the arguments upon which these objections were formulated. They are divided into four reasons. The first stems from a certain expectation or conception about the function of constitutions. The second rests on a view of how constitutions might encourage or undermine democracy by transferring decision-making powers to non-representative institutions such as the judiciary. The third claims a breach of what would be a globally accumulated constitutional experience. The fourth, and last, is formulated from a certain social and/ or national culture that must be respected. Each of these criteria will be subjected to scrutiny with reasons that, just as the criteria themselves, are echoed in the specialized literature.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Law and Disagreement

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Core of the Case against Judicial Review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rcs
                Revista de ciencias sociales (Valparaíso)
                Rev. cienc. soc. (Valpso)
                Universidad de Valparaíso. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales (Valparaíso, , Chile )
                0716-7725
                0719-8442
                July 2023
                : 82
                : 177-225
                Affiliations
                [1] Santiago Santiago de Chile orgnameUniversidad Diego Portales Chile domingo.lovera@ 123456udp.cl
                Article
                S0719-84422023000100177 S0719-8442(23)00008200177
                10.22370/rcs.2023.82.3670
                8d2b4408-8eeb-470a-9ef5-16d54c8e4db3

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 20 March 2023
                : 13 June 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 104, Pages: 49
                Product

                SciELO Chile

                Categories
                Artículo de investigación

                Constitutional matters,Poder constituyente,Derecho comparado,Materias de constitución,Constituent power,Comparative law

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content928

                Most referenced authors388