16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer—The Penelope-B Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          About one third of patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) will relapse. Thus, additional therapy is needed. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in the metastatic setting.

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          PENELOPE-B ( NCT01864746 ) is a double-blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III study in women with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane‐containing NACT and at high risk of relapse (clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3 or 2 and ypN+). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with a two-sided efficacy boundary P < .0463 because of two interim analyses.

          RESULTS

          One thousand two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. The median age was 49.0 years (range, 19-79), and the majority were ypN+ with Ki-67 ≤ 15%; 59.4% of patients had a clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3. 50.1% received aromatase inhibitor, and 33% of premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog in addition to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (92% complete), 308 events were confirmed. Palbociclib did not improve iDFS versus placebo added to ET-stratified hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% repeated CI, 0.74 to 1.17) and two-sided weighted log-rank test (Cui, Hung, and Wang) P = .525. There was no difference among the subgroups. Most common related serious adverse events were infections and vascular disorders in 113 (9.1%) patients with no difference between the treatment arms. Eight fatal serious adverse events (two palbociclib and six placebo) were reported.

          CONCLUSION

          Palbociclib for 1 year in addition to ET did not improve iDFS in women with residual invasive disease after NACT.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          April 01 2021
          : JCO.20.03639
          Affiliations
          [1 ]German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
          [2 ]Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
          [3 ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
          [4 ]Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
          [5 ]GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
          [6 ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
          [7 ]UCBG (Unicancer Breast Cancer Group) and Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
          [8 ]Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, and KCSG (Korean Cancer Study Group), Korea
          [9 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Health, Richmond, VA
          [10 ]NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA
          [11 ]Breast Cancer Trials Australia and New Zealand, Newcastle, Australia
          [12 ]Oncology Research Group, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
          [13 ]BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          [14 ]Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
          [15 ]Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and Breast Group, Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland
          [16 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
          [17 ]Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
          [18 ]Breast Department, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
          [19 ]Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
          [20 ]Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
          [21 ]ABCSG, Vienna, Austria
          [22 ]Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
          [23 ]Pfizer Inc, New York, NY
          [24 ]IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
          [25 ]Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.20.03639
          33793299
          8c2a3118-b3b0-4a0d-b36c-fd59a09ecdd5
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article