14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceptual history propagates down to early levels of sensory analysis

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          One function of perceptual systems is to construct and maintain a reliable representation of the environment. A useful strategy intrinsic to modern “Bayesian” theories of perception 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is to take advantage of the relative stability of the input and use perceptual history (priors) to predict current perception. This strategy is efficient 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 but can lead to stimuli being biased toward perceptual history, clearly revealed in a phenomenon known as serial dependence. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 However, it is still unclear whether serial dependence biases sensory encoding or only perceptual decisions. 15 , 16 We leveraged on the “surround tilt illusion”—where tilted flanking stimuli strongly bias perceived orientation—to measure its influence on the pattern of serial dependence, which is typically maximal for similar orientations of past and present stimuli. 7 , 10 Maximal serial dependence for a neutral stimulus preceded by an illusory one occurred when the perceived, not the physical, orientations of the two stimuli matched, suggesting that the priors biasing current perception incorporate the effect of the illusion. However, maximal serial dependence of illusory stimuli induced by neutral stimuli occurred when their physical (not perceived) orientations were matched, suggesting that priors interact with incoming sensory signals before they are biased by flanking stimuli. The evidence suggests that priors are high-level constructs incorporating contextual information, which interact directly with early sensory signals, not with highly processed perceptual representations.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Perception is heavily biased by perceptual history and expectations

          • Perceptual history includes illusory effects driven by spatial context

          • This representation propagates back to sensory areas preceding context effects

          • The results point to a neural architecture consistent with predictive coding

          Abstract

          Perception can be strongly biased by expectations, which are in part shaped by perceptual history. Cicchini et al. demonstrate that the bias is driven by signals from high levels of analysis propagating down to interact at relatively low levels, implicating a recurrent network in sensory analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

          We describe a model of visual processing in which feedback connections from a higher- to a lower-order visual cortical area carry predictions of lower-level neural activities, whereas the feedforward connections carry the residual errors between the predictions and the actual lower-level activities. When exposed to natural images, a hierarchical network of model neurons implementing such a model developed simple-cell-like receptive fields. A subset of neurons responsible for carrying the residual errors showed endstopping and other extra-classical receptive-field effects. These results suggest that rather than being exclusively feedforward phenomena, nonclassical surround effects in the visual cortex may also result from cortico-cortical feedback as a consequence of the visual system using an efficient hierarchical strategy for encoding natural images.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?

            This article reviews a free-energy formulation that advances Helmholtz's agenda to find principles of brain function based on conservation laws and neuronal energy. It rests on advances in statistical physics, theoretical biology and machine learning to explain a remarkable range of facts about brain structure and function. We could have just scratched the surface of what this formulation offers; for example, it is becoming clear that the Bayesian brain is just one facet of the free-energy principle and that perception is an inevitable consequence of active exchange with the environment. Furthermore, one can see easily how constructs like memory, attention, value, reinforcement and salience might disclose their simple relationships within this framework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation.

              To use sensory information efficiently to make judgments and guide action in the world, the brain must represent and use information about uncertainty in its computations for perception and action. Bayesian methods have proven successful in building computational theories for perception and sensorimotor control, and psychophysics is providing a growing body of evidence that human perceptual computations are "Bayes' optimal". This leads to the "Bayesian coding hypothesis": that the brain represents sensory information probabilistically, in the form of probability distributions. Several computational schemes have recently been proposed for how this might be achieved in populations of neurons. Neurophysiological data on the hypothesis, however, is almost non-existent. A major challenge for neuroscientists is to test these ideas experimentally, and so determine whether and how neurons code information about sensory uncertainty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                22 March 2021
                22 March 2021
                : 31
                : 6
                : 1245-1250.e2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author dave@ 123456in.cnr.it
                [4]

                These authors contributed equally

                [5]

                Lead contact

                Article
                S0960-9822(20)31824-8
                10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.004
                7987721
                33373639
                8bb32a5c-3db2-4c76-bbe4-75abb4138275
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 September 2020
                : 2 November 2020
                : 4 December 2020
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                serial dependence,predictive coding,tilt illusion,contextual effects,optimal perception,feedback

                Comments

                Comment on this article