6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early and Empirical High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury : The CRYOSTAT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 3 , 7 , 3 , 8 , 1 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , CRYOSTAT-2 Principal Investigators
      JAMA
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Critical bleeding is associated with a high mortality rate in patients with trauma. Hemorrhage is exacerbated by a complex derangement of coagulation, including an acute fibrinogen deficiency. Management is fibrinogen replacement with cryoprecipitate transfusions or fibrinogen concentrate, usually administered relatively late during hemorrhage.

          Objective

          To assess whether survival could be improved by administering an early and empirical high dose of cryoprecipitate to all patients with trauma and bleeding that required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          CRYOSTAT-2 was an interventional, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled, international, multicenter study. Patients were enrolled at 26 UK and US major trauma centers from August 2017 to November 2021. Eligible patients were injured adults requiring activation of the hospital’s major hemorrhage protocol with evidence of active hemorrhage, systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg at any time, and receiving at least 1 U of a blood component transfusion.

          Intervention

          Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive standard care, which was the local major hemorrhage protocol (reviewed for guideline adherence), or cryoprecipitate, in which 3 pools of cryoprecipitate (6-g fibrinogen equivalent) were to be administered in addition to standard care within 90 minutes of randomization and 3 hours of injury.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days in the intention-to-treat population.

          Results

          Among 1604 eligible patients, 799 were randomized to the cryoprecipitate group and 805 to the standard care group. Missing primary outcome data occurred in 73 patients (principally due to withdrawal of consent) and 1531 (95%) were included in the primary analysis population. The median (IQR) age of participants was 39 (26-55) years, 1251 (79%) were men, median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 29 (18-43), 36% had penetrating injury, and 33% had systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg at hospital arrival. All-cause 28-day mortality in the intention-to-treat population was 26.1% in the standard care group vs 25.3% in the cryoprecipitate group (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.75-1.23]; P = .74). There was no difference in safety outcomes or incidence of thrombotic events in the standard care vs cryoprecipitate group (12.9% vs 12.7%).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol, the addition of early and empirical high-dose cryoprecipitate to standard care did not improve all cause 28-day mortality.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04704869; ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN14998314

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

          Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale

            B Jennett (1975)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial.

              Severely injured patients experiencing hemorrhagic shock often require massive transfusion. Earlier transfusion with higher blood product ratios (plasma, platelets, and red blood cells), defined as damage control resuscitation, has been associated with improved outcomes; however, there have been no large multicenter clinical trials. To determine the effectiveness and safety of transfusing patients with severe trauma and major bleeding using plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 ratio compared with a 1:1:2 ratio. Pragmatic, phase 3, multisite, randomized clinical trial of 680 severely injured patients who arrived at 1 of 12 level I trauma centers in North America directly from the scene and were predicted to require massive transfusion between August 2012 and December 2013. Blood product ratios of 1:1:1 (338 patients) vs 1:1:2 (342 patients) during active resuscitation in addition to all local standard-of-care interventions (uncontrolled). Primary outcomes were 24-hour and 30-day all-cause mortality. Prespecified ancillary outcomes included time to hemostasis, blood product volumes transfused, complications, incidence of surgical procedures, and functional status. No significant differences were detected in mortality at 24 hours (12.7% in 1:1:1 group vs 17.0% in 1:1:2 group; difference, -4.2% [95% CI, -9.6% to 1.1%]; P = .12) or at 30 days (22.4% vs 26.1%, respectively; difference, -3.7% [95% CI, -10.2% to 2.7%]; P = .26). Exsanguination, which was the predominant cause of death within the first 24 hours, was significantly decreased in the 1:1:1 group (9.2% vs 14.6% in 1:1:2 group; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -10.4% to -0.5%]; P = .03). More patients in the 1:1:1 group achieved hemostasis than in the 1:1:2 group (86% vs 78%, respectively; P = .006). Despite the 1:1:1 group receiving more plasma (median of 7 U vs 5 U, P < .001) and platelets (12 U vs 6 U, P < .001) and similar amounts of red blood cells (9 U) over the first 24 hours, no differences between the 2 groups were found for the 23 prespecified complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ failure, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, and transfusion-related complications. Among patients with severe trauma and major bleeding, early administration of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 ratio compared with a 1:1:2 ratio did not result in significant differences in mortality at 24 hours or at 30 days. However, more patients in the 1:1:1 group achieved hemostasis and fewer experienced death due to exsanguination by 24 hours. Even though there was an increased use of plasma and platelets transfused in the 1:1:1 group, no other safety differences were identified between the 2 groups. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01545232.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                October 12 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Nuffield Orthopedic Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Center for Translational Injury Research, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
                [4 ]NHS Blood and Transplant Clinical Trials Unit, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, United Kingdom
                [5 ]NHS Blood and Transplant Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [6 ]The Trauma Audit & Research Network, University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
                [8 ]Radcliffe Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Blood and Transplant and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [9 ]for the CRYOSTAT-2 Principal Investigators
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2023.21019
                37824155
                8b684b4c-1ded-4e56-90c1-a98018f4cf11
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article