3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation: a scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is multifactorial in nature, with recent research highlighting the role of multifidus dysfunction in a subset of nonspecific CLBP. This review aimed to provide a foundational reference that elucidates the pathophysiological cascade of multifidus dysfunction, how it contrasts with other CLBP etiologies and the role of restorative neurostimulation.

          Methods

          A scoping review of the literature.

          Results

          In total, 194 articles were included, and findings were presented to highlight emerging principles related to multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation. Multifidus dysfunction is diagnosed by a history of mechanical, axial, nociceptive CLBP and exam demonstrating functional lumbar instability, which differs from other structural etiologies. Diagnostic images may be used to grade multifidus atrophy and assess other structural pathologies. While various treatments exist for CLBP, restorative neurostimulation distinguishes itself from traditional neurostimulation in a way that treats a different etiology, targets a different anatomical site, and has a distinctive mechanism of action.

          Conclusions

          Multifidus dysfunction has been proposed to result from loss of neuromuscular control, which may manifest clinically as muscle inhibition resulting in altered movement patterns. Over time, this cycle may result in potential atrophy, degeneration and CLBP. Restorative neurostimulation, a novel implantable neurostimulator system, stimulates the efferent lumbar medial branch nerve to elicit repetitive multifidus contractions. This intervention aims to interrupt the cycle of dysfunction and normalize multifidus activity incrementally, potentially restoring neuromuscular control. Restorative neurostimulation has been shown to reduce pain and disability in CLBP, improve quality of life and reduce health care expenditures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references192

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention

            Low back pain is a very common symptom. It occurs in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries and all age groups from children to the elderly population. Globally, years lived with disability caused by low back pain increased by 54% between 1990 and 2015, mainly because of population increase and ageing, with the biggest increase seen in low-income and middle-income countries. Low back pain is now the leading cause of disability worldwide. For nearly all people with low back pain, it is not possible to identify a specific nociceptive cause. Only a small proportion of people have a well understood pathological cause-eg, a vertebral fracture, malignancy, or infection. People with physically demanding jobs, physical and mental comorbidities, smokers, and obese individuals are at greatest risk of reporting low back pain. Disabling low back pain is over-represented among people with low socioeconomic status. Most people with new episodes of low back pain recover quickly; however, recurrence is common and in a small proportion of people, low back pain becomes persistent and disabling. Initial high pain intensity, psychological distress, and accompanying pain at multiple body sites increases the risk of persistent disabling low back pain. Increasing evidence shows that central pain-modulating mechanisms and pain cognitions have important roles in the development of persistent disabling low back pain. Cost, health-care use, and disability from low back pain vary substantially between countries and are influenced by local culture and social systems, as well as by beliefs about cause and effect. Disability and costs attributed to low back pain are projected to increase in coming decades, in particular in low-income and middle-income countries, where health and other systems are often fragile and not equipped to cope with this growing burden. Intensified research efforts and global initiatives are clearly needed to address the burden of low back pain as a public health problem.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises

              The current International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definition of pain as "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage" was recommended by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy and adopted by the IASP Council in 1979. This definition has become accepted widely by health care professionals and researchers in the pain field and adopted by several professional, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations, including the World Health Organization. In recent years, some in the field have reasoned that advances in our understanding of pain warrant a reevaluation of the definition and have proposed modifications. Therefore, in 2018, the IASP formed a 14-member, multinational Presidential Task Force comprising individuals with broad expertise in clinical and basic science related to pain, to evaluate the current definition and accompanying note and recommend whether they should be retained or changed. This review provides a synopsis of the critical concepts, the analysis of comments from the IASP membership and public, and the committee's final recommendations for revisions to the definition and notes, which were discussed over a 2-year period. The task force ultimately recommended that the definition of pain be revised to "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage," and that the accompanying notes be updated to a bulleted list that included the etymology. The revised definition and notes were unanimously accepted by the IASP Council early this year.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pain Med
                Pain Med
                painmedicine
                Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine
                Oxford University Press
                1526-2375
                1526-4637
                December 2023
                13 July 2023
                13 July 2023
                : 24
                : 12
                : 1341-1354
                Affiliations
                Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
                Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
                Cantor Spine Institute at the Paley Orthopedic & Spine Institute , West Palm Beach, FL 33407, United States
                Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence, RI 02903, United States
                Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Vinicius Tieppo Francio, MD, MS, DC, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Kansas Medical Center; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS 1034, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Email: vtieppofrancio@ 123456kumc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-0058
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-4810
                Article
                pnad098
                10.1093/pm/pnad098
                10690869
                37439698
                8aba1df6-8381-4342-8818-3b0753dc5f51
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 March 2023
                : 14 June 2023
                : 10 July 2023
                : 29 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: NIH, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Categories
                Neuromodulation & Minimally Invasive Surgery Section
                Review Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00010

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                multifidus,restorative neurostimulation,lumbar medial branch nerve,neuromodulation,peripheral nerve stimulation,chronic low back pain,sensorimotor control,neuromuscular control

                Comments

                Comment on this article