7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phonatory impairment in Parkinson's disease: evidence from nonlinear dynamic analysis and perturbation analysis.

      Journal of Voice
      Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, epidemiology, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Acoustics, Voice Disorders, diagnosis, physiopathology, Voice Quality

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) will eventually experience vocal impairment as their condition advances. Using standard perturbation analyses (parameters like jitter and shimmer) to measure fluctuations in phonatory signal may inhibit researchers from recognizing severely disordered patterns that seem to be present in the voices of some PD patients. Nonlinear dynamic analysis can quantify these aperiodic patterns, which indicate severe pathology that is usually characterized perceptually by hoarseness. Here, sustained vowel phonations of a heterogeneous group of PD subjects (20 women and 21 men) were compared with those of a control group (22 women and 18 men) based on results of nonlinear dynamic analyses (D(2)) and perturbation analyses. Results showed PD subjects as a whole to have significantly higher D(2) values than control subjects (P = 0.016), which indicates increased signal complexity in PD vocal pathology. Differences in the comparison of these two groups were significant in jitter (P = 0.014) but nonsignificant in shimmer (P = 0.695). Furthermore, the performance on these three measures was affected by subject sex. Nonlinear dynamic analysis showed significantly higher D(2) in the female PD group than in the female control group (P = 0.001), but jitter and shimmer did not show such a difference. The male PD group had statistically higher jitter than the male control group (P = 0.036), but these groups did not differ in D(2) or shimmer. Overall, nonlinear dynamic analysis may be a valuable method for the diagnosis of Parkinsonian laryngeal pathology.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16377130
          10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.011

          Chemistry
          Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Parkinson Disease,epidemiology,Severity of Illness Index,Speech Acoustics,Voice Disorders,diagnosis,physiopathology,Voice Quality

          Comments

          Comment on this article