Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of vaccination and wearing masks on seasonal influenza in Matsumoto City, Japan, in the 2014/2015 season: An observational study among all elementary schoolchildren

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Measures of seasonal influenza control are generally divided into two categories: pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions. The effectiveness of these measures remains unclear, because of insufficient study sample size and/or differences in study settings. This observational epidemiological study involved all elementary schoolchildren in Matsumoto City, Japan, with seasonal influenza during the 2014/2015 season. Questionnaires, including experiences with influenza diagnosis and socio-demographic factors, were distributed to all 29 public elementary schools, involving 13,217 children, at the end of February 2015. Data were obtained from 10,524 children and analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The result showed that vaccination (odds ratio 0.866, 95% confidence interval 0.786–0.954) and wearing masks (0.859, 0.778–0.949) had significant protective association. Hand washing (1.447, 1.274–1.644) and gargling (1.319, 1.183–1.471), however, were not associated with protection. In the natural setting, hand washing and gargling showed a negative association, which may have been due to inappropriate infection control measures or aggregating infected and non-infected children to conduct those measures. These results may indicate a pathway for influenza transmission and explain why seasonal influenza control remains difficult in school settings. The overall effectiveness of vaccination and mask wearing was 9.9% and 8.6%, respectively. After dividing children into higher (grades 4–6) and lower (grade 1–3) grade groups, the effectiveness of vaccination became greater in the lower grade group, and the effectiveness of wearing masks became greater in the higher grade group. These results may provide valuable information about designing infection control measures that allocate resources among children.

          Highlights

          • An influenza survey was conducted in all 29 elementary schools in Matsumoto City.

          • Vaccination and wearing of masks were effective in infection control.

          • Effectiveness of protection methods differed between old and young schoolchildren.

          • Communal hand washing and water gargling was associated with the risk of influenza.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis.

          To quantify the effect of hand-hygiene interventions on rates of gastrointestinal and respiratory illnesses and to identify interventions that provide the greatest efficacy, we searched 4 electronic databases for hand-hygiene trials published from January 1960 through May 2007 and conducted meta-analyses to generate pooled rate ratios across interventions (N=30 studies). Improvements in hand hygiene resulted in reductions in gastrointestinal illness of 31% (95% confidence intervals [CI]=19%, 42%) and reductions in respiratory illness of 21% (95% CI=5%, 34%). The most beneficial intervention was hand-hygiene education with use of nonantibacterial soap. Use of antibacterial soap showed little added benefit compared with use of nonantibacterial soap. Hand hygiene is clearly effective against gastrointestinal and, to a lesser extent, respiratory infections. Studies examining hygiene practices during respiratory illness and interventions targeting aerosol transmission are needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial.

            Few data are available about the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions for preventing influenza virus transmission. To investigate whether hand hygiene and use of facemasks prevents household transmission of influenza. Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was computer generated; allocation was concealed from treating physicians and clinics and implemented by study nurses at the time of the initial household visit. Participants and personnel administering the interventions were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00425893) Households in Hong Kong. 407 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza-like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households. Lifestyle education (control) (134 households), hand hygiene (136 households), or surgical facemasks plus hand hygiene (137 households) for all household members. Influenza virus infection in contacts, as confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or diagnosed clinically after 7 days. Sixty (8%) contacts in the 259 households had RT-PCR-confirmed influenza virus infection in the 7 days after intervention. Hand hygiene with or without facemasks seemed to reduce influenza transmission, but the differences compared with the control group were not significant. In 154 households in which interventions were implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR-confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87]). Adherence to interventions varied. The delay from index patient symptom onset to intervention and variable adherence may have mitigated intervention effectiveness. Hand hygiene and facemasks seemed to prevent household transmission of influenza virus when implemented within 36 hours of index patient symptom onset. These findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions are important for mitigation of pandemic and interpandemic influenza. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Survival of influenza viruses on environmental surfaces.

              To investigate the transmission of influenza viruses via hands and environmental surfaces, the survival of laboratory-grown influenza A and influenza B viruses on various surfaces was studied. Both influenza A and B viruses survived for 24-48 hr on hard, nonporous surfaces such as stainless steel and plastic but survived for less than 8-12 hr on cloth, paper, and tissues. Measurable quantities of influenza A virus were transferred from stainless steel surfaces to hands for 24 hr and from tissues to hands for up to 15 min. Virus survived on hands for up to 5 min after transfer from the environmental surfaces. These observations suggest that the transmission of virus from donors who are shedding large amounts could occur for 2-8 hr via stainless steel surfaces and for a few minutes via paper tissues. Thus, under conditions of heavy environmental contamination, the transmission of influenza virus via fomites may be possible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med Rep
                Prev Med Rep
                Preventive Medicine Reports
                Elsevier
                2211-3355
                06 December 2016
                March 2017
                06 December 2016
                : 5
                : 86-91
                Affiliations
                [a ]Center for Health, Safety and Environment Management, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
                [b ]Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
                [c ]The First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
                [d ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
                [e ]Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
                [f ]Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Management, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.Center for Health, Safety and Environmental ManagementShinshu University3-1-1 AsahiMatsumotoNagano390-8621Japan uchida01@ 123456shinshu-u.ac.jp
                Article
                S2211-3355(16)30155-3
                10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.002
                5153448
                27981021
                8a7ad035-1410-4859-a069-f927d4fbbcec
                © 2016 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 5 June 2016
                : 28 November 2016
                : 4 December 2016
                Categories
                Regular Article

                influenza,vaccine,npis,efficacy,effectiveness,epidemiology,observational study,schoolchildren

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content259

                Cited by20

                Most referenced authors262