Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Moving across Borders: The Work Life Experiences of Czech Cross‐border Workers during the COVID‐19 Pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The experiences of cross‐border workers (CBWs) and the difficulties they face during the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic have been neglected in previous research. CBWs experience various stressors under normal circumstances, where they are often subjected to unequal working conditions and forced to transition between two different societies. The measures that were introduced in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, including the implementation of physical borders, further worsened the situation for these individuals. Herein, we draw on qualitative interview data from 35 CBWs from the Czech Republic and Germany to explore their experiences of work, stress, support, and their positioning in society during the pandemic. We detail the dissatisfaction felt by CBWs regarding re‐bordering, the lack of coordination in the crisis management, and the lack of support from national governments and the EU. This study provides unique insights into the difficulties and experiences of CBWs in a time of crisis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.

            Criteria for determining the trustworthiness of qualitative research were introduced by Guba and Lincoln in the 1980s when they replaced terminology for achieving rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability with dependability, credibility, and transferability. Strategies for achieving trustworthiness were also introduced. This landmark contribution to qualitative research remains in use today, with only minor modifications in format. Despite the significance of this contribution over the past four decades, the strategies recommended to achieve trustworthiness have not been critically examined. Recommendations for where, why, and how to use these strategies have not been developed, and how well they achieve their intended goal has not been examined. We do not know, for example, what impact these strategies have on the completed research. In this article, I critique these strategies. I recommend that qualitative researchers return to the terminology of social sciences, using rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability. I then make recommendations for the appropriate use of the strategies recommended to achieve rigor: prolonged engagement, persistent observation, and thick, rich description; inter-rater reliability, negative case analysis; peer review or debriefing; clarifying researcher bias; member checking; external audits; and triangulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                joshua.haist@newcastle.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Common Mark Stud
                J Common Mark Stud
                10.1111/(ISSN)1468-5965
                JCMS
                Journal of Common Market Studies
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0021-9886
                1468-5965
                31 May 2022
                31 May 2022
                : 10.1111/jcms.13362
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Newcastle University Business School Newcastle upon Tyne UK
                [ 2 ] Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Faculty of Arts Ústí nad Labem‐Město Czech Republic
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Joshua Haist, Newcastle University Business School, 5 Barrack Rd, NE1 4SE, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

                email: joshua.haist@ 123456newcastle.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-6363
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-6386
                Article
                JCMS13362 JCMS-21-0248.R1
                10.1111/jcms.13362
                9348376
                8a0237a4-d73c-41b1-98cc-ad2504e8f48b
                © 2022 The Authors. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies published by University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 22 February 2022
                : 15 September 2021
                : 14 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 19, Words: 6957
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:03.08.2022

                covid‐19 pandemic,dual labour market,rebordering,cross‐border commuters,low‐status

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content178

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors353