11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cirrus: An Automated Mammography-Based Measure of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Textural Features

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We applied machine learning to find a novel breast cancer predictor based on information in a mammogram.

          Methods

          Using image-processing techniques, we automatically processed 46 158 analog mammograms for 1345 cases and 4235 controls from a cohort and case–control study of Australian women, and a cohort study of Japanese American women, extracting 20 textural features not based on pixel brightness threshold. We used Bayesian lasso regression to create individual- and mammogram-specific measures of breast cancer risk, Cirrus. We trained and tested measures across studies. We fitted Cirrus with conventional mammographic density measures using logistic regression, and computed odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation adjusted for age and body mass index.

          Results

          Combining studies, almost all textural features were associated with case–control status. The ORs for Cirrus measures trained on one study and tested on another study ranged from 1.56 to 1.78 (all P < 10 −6). For the Cirrus measure derived from combining studies, the OR was 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73 to 2.09), equivalent to a fourfold interquartile risk ratio, and was little attenuated after adjusting for conventional measures. In contrast, the OR for the conventional measure was 1.34 (95% CI = 1.25 to 1.43), and after adjusting for Cirrus it became 1.16 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.24; P = 4 × 10 −5).

          Conclusions

          A fully automated personal risk measure created from combining textural image features performs better at predicting breast cancer risk than conventional mammographic density risk measures, capturing half the risk-predicting ability of the latter measures. In terms of differentiating affected and unaffected women on a population basis, Cirrus could be one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Bayesian Lasso

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment

              Background The assessment of a woman’s risk for developing breast cancer has become increasingly important for establishing personalized screening recommendations and forming preventive strategies. Studies have consistently shown a strong relationship between breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal patterns, typically assessed by percent mammographic density. This paper will review the advancing role of mammographic texture analysis as a potential novel approach to characterize the breast parenchymal tissue to augment conventional density assessment in breast cancer risk estimation. Main text The analysis of mammographic texture provides refined, localized descriptors of parenchymal tissue complexity. Currently, there is growing evidence in support of textural features having the potential to augment the typically dichotomized descriptors (dense or not dense) of area or volumetric measures of breast density in breast cancer risk assessment. Therefore, a substantial research effort has been devoted to automate mammographic texture analysis, with the aim of ultimately incorporating such quantitative measures into breast cancer risk assessment models. In this paper, we review current and emerging approaches in this field, summarizing key methodological details and related studies using novel computerized approaches. We also discuss research challenges for advancing the role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk stratification and accelerating its clinical translation. Conclusions The objective is to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers in the field of parenchymal pattern analysis in breast cancer risk assessment, while indicating key directions for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                jncics
                JNCI Cancer Spectrum
                Oxford University Press
                2515-5091
                October 2018
                07 December 2018
                07 December 2018
                : 2
                : 4
                : pky057
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [2 ]Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]IBM Australia - Research, Southbank, Victoria, Australia
                [4 ]Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University, and the University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
                [5 ]Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
                [7 ]Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [8 ]University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
                [9 ]Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: John Hopper, PhD, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Level 3/207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia (e-mail: j.hopper@ 123456unimelb.edu.au ).
                Article
                pky057
                10.1093/jncics/pky057
                6649799
                31360877
                89b5da98-7230-4963-a5d1-0ce42172c162
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 December 2017
                : 13 September 2018
                : 24 September 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article