2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Wearable biofeedback device to assess gait features and improve gait pattern in people with parkinson’s disease: a case series

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          People with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) show abnormal gait patterns compromising their independence and quality of life. Among all gait alterations due to PD, reduced step length, increased cadence, and decreased ground-reaction force during the loading response and push-off phases are the most common. Wearable biofeedback technologies offer the possibility to provide correlated single or multi-modal stimuli associated with specific gait events or gait performance, hence promoting subjects’ awareness of their gait disturbances. Moreover, the portability and applicability in clinical and home settings for gait rehabilitation increase the efficiency in the management of PD. The Wearable Vibrotactile Bidirectional Interface (BI) is a biofeedback device designed to extract gait features in real-time and deliver a customized vibrotactile stimulus at the waist of PD subjects synchronously with specific gait phases. The aims of this study were to measure the effect of the BI on gait parameters usually compromised by the typical bradykinetic gait and to assess its usability and safety in clinical practice.

          Methods

          In this case series, seven subjects (age: 70.4 ± 8.1 years; H&Y: 2.7 ± 0.3) used the BI and performed a test on a 10-meter walkway (10mWT) and a two-minute walk test (2MWT) as pre-training (Pre-trn) and post-training (Post-trn) assessments. Gait tests were executed in random order with (Bf) and without (No-Bf) the activation of the biofeedback stimulus. All subjects performed three training sessions of 40 min to familiarize themselves with the BI during walking activities. A descriptive analysis of gait parameters (i.e., gait speed, step length, cadence, walking distance, double-support phase) was carried out. The 2-sided Wilcoxon sign-test was used to assess differences between Bf and No-Bf assessments ( p < 0.05).

          Results

          After training subjects improved gait speed (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 0.72(0.59,0.72) m/sec; Post-trn_Bf: 0.95(0.69,0.98) m/sec; p = 0.043) and step length (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 0.87(0.81,0.96) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 1.05(0.96,1.14) meters; p = 0.023) using the biofeedback during the 10mWT. Similarly, subjects’ walking distance improved (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 97.5 (80.3,110.8) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 118.5(99.3,129.3) meters; p = 0.028) and the duration of the double-support phase decreased (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 29.7(26.8,31.7) %; Post-trn_Bf: 27.2(24.6,28.7) %; p = 0.018) during the 2MWT. An immediate effect of the BI was detected in cadence (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 108(103.8,116.7) step/min; Pre-trn_Bf: 101.4(96.3,111.4) step/min; p = 0.028) at Pre-trn, and in walking distance at Post-trn (Post-trn_No-Bf: 112.5(97.5,124.5) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 118.5(99.3,129.3) meters; p = 0.043). SUS scores were 77.5 in five subjects and 80.3 in two subjects. In terms of safety, all subjects completed the protocol without any adverse events.

          Conclusion

          The BI seems to be usable and safe for PD users. Temporal gait parameters have been measured during clinical walking tests providing detailed outcomes. A short period of training with the BI suggests improvements in the gait patterns of people with PD. This research serves as preliminary support for future integration of the BI as an instrument for clinical assessment and rehabilitation in people with PD, both in hospital and remote environments.

          Trial registration

          The study protocol was registered (DGDMF.VI/P/I.5.i.m.2/2019/1297) and approved by the General Directorate of Medical Devices and Pharmaceutical Service of the Italian Ministry of Health and by the ethics committee of the Lombardy region (Milan, Italy).

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-024-01403-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations.

          The Movement Disorder Society Task Force for Rating Scales for Parkinson's disease (PD) prepared a critique of the Hoehn and Yahr scale (HY). Strengths of the HY scale include its wide utilization and acceptance. Progressively higher stages correlate with neuroimaging studies of dopaminergic loss, and high correlations exist between the HY scale and some standardized scales of motor impairment, disability, and quality of life. Weaknesses include the scale's mixing of impairment and disability and its non-linearity. Because the HY scale is weighted heavily toward postural instability as the primary index of disease severity, it does not capture completely impairments or disability from other motor features of PD and gives no information on nonmotor problems. Direct clinimetric testing of the HY scale has been very limited, but the scale fulfills at least some criteria for reliability and validity, especially for the midranges of the scale (Stages 2-4). Although a "modified HY scale" that includes 0.5 increments has been adopted widely, no clinimetric data are available on this adaptation. The Task Force recommends that: (1) the HY scale be used in its original form for demographic presentation of patient groups; (2) when the HY scale is used for group description, medians and ranges should be reported and analysis of changes should use nonparametric methods; (3) in research settings, the HY scale is useful primarily for defining inclusion/exclusion criteria; (4) to retain simplicity, clinicians should "rate what you see" and therefore incorporate comorbidities when assigning a HY stage; and (5) because of the wide usage of the modified HY scale with 0.5 increments, this adaptation warrants clinimetric testing. Without such testing, however, the original five-point scales should be maintained.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?

            There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury. Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary communication. This Point of View describes the problem and offers a solution in the form of definitions of compensation and recovery at the neuronal, motor performance, and functional levels within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning model.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review.

              As one of the most universal of all human activities, gait in the able-bodied has received considerable attention, but many aspects still need to be clarified. Symmetry or asymmetry in the actions of the lower extremities during walking and the possible effect of laterality on gait are two prevalent and controversial issues. The purpose of this study was to review the work done over the last few decades in demonstrating: (a) whether or not the lower limbs behave symmetrically during able-bodied gait; and (b) how limb dominance affects the symmetrical or asymmetrical behavior of the lower extremities. The literature reviewed shows that gait symmetry has often been assumed, to simplify data collection and analysis. In contrast, asymmetrical behavior of the lower limbs during able-bodied ambulation was addressed in numerous investigations and was found to reflect natural functional differences between the lower extremities. These functional differences were probably related to the contribution of each limb in carrying out the tasks of propulsion and control during able-bodied walking. In current debates on gait symmetry in able-bodied subjects, laterality has been cited as an explanation for the existence of functional differences between the lower extremities, although a number of studies do not support the hypothesis of a relationship between gait symmetry and laterality. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate functional gait asymmetry and its relationship to laterality, taking into consideration the biomechanical aspects of gait.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tbowman@dongnocchi.it
                Journal
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
                BioMed Central (London )
                1743-0003
                26 June 2024
                26 June 2024
                2024
                : 21
                : 110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.418563.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1090 9021, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, ; Milan, Italy
                [2 ]The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, ( https://ror.org/025602r80) Pisa, 56127 Italy
                [3 ]Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, ( https://ror.org/025602r80) Pisa, 56127 Italy
                [4 ]Department of Physiopathology and Transplants, University of Milan, ( https://ror.org/00wjc7c48) Milan, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.418563.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1090 9021, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, ; Florence, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.5326.2, ISNI 0000 0001 1940 4177, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), ; Rome, Italy
                Article
                1403
                10.1186/s12984-024-01403-z
                11202340
                38926876
                89ad69e0-4bf1-4b84-98e7-755d5f6084c0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 January 2023
                : 11 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: CYBERLEGs Plus Plus project within the H2020 framework
                Award ID: 731931
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003196, Ministero della Salute;
                Award ID: Ricerca corrente 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Neurosciences
                wearable device,biofeedback,parkinson’s disease,gait parameters,assessment,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article