68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The recent appearance of low cost virtual reality (VR) technologies – like the Oculus Rift, the HTC Vive and the Sony PlayStation VR – and Mixed Reality Interfaces (MRITF) – like the Hololens – is attracting the attention of users and researchers suggesting it may be the next largest stepping stone in technological innovation. However, the history of VR technology is longer than it may seem: the concept of VR was formulated in the 1960s and the first commercial VR tools appeared in the late 1980s. For this reason, during the last 20 years, 100s of researchers explored the processes, effects, and applications of this technology producing 1000s of scientific papers. What is the outcome of this significant research work? This paper wants to provide an answer to this question by exploring, using advanced scientometric techniques, the existing research corpus in the field. We collected all the existent articles about VR in the Web of Science Core Collection scientific database, and the resultant dataset contained 21,667 records for VR and 9,944 for augmented reality (AR). The bibliographic record contained various fields, such as author, title, abstract, country, and all the references (needed for the citation analysis). The network and cluster analysis of the literature showed a composite panorama characterized by changes and evolutions over the time. Indeed, whether until 5 years ago, the main publication media on VR concerned both conference proceeding and journals, more recently journals constitute the main medium of communication. Similarly, if at first computer science was the leading research field, nowadays clinical areas have increased, as well as the number of countries involved in VR research. The present work discusses the evolution and changes over the time of the use of VR in the main areas of application with an emphasis on the future expected VR’s capacities, increases and challenges. We conclude considering the disruptive contribution that VR/AR/MRITF will be able to get in scientific fields, as well in human communication and interaction, as already happened with the advent of mobile phones by increasing the use and the development of scientific applications (e.g., in clinical areas) and by modifying the social communication and interaction among people.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

            The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency. We used the example of a keyword search to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis. All databases were practical in use and offered numerous search facilities. PubMed and Google Scholar are accessed for free. The keyword search with PubMed offers optimal update frequency and includes online early articles; other databases can rate articles by number of citations, as an index of importance. For citation analysis, Scopus offers about 20% more coverage than Web of Science, whereas Google Scholar offers results of inconsistent accuracy. PubMed remains an optimal tool in biomedical electronic research. Scopus covers a wider journal range, of help both in keyword searching and citation analysis, but it is currently limited to recent articles (published after 1995) compared with Web of Science. Google Scholar, as for the Web in general, can help in the retrieval of even the most obscure information but its use is marred by inadequate, less often updated, citation information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 November 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 2086
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico Italiano , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart , Milan, Italy
                [3] 3Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València , Valencia, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Albert Rizzo, University of Southern California, United States

                Reviewed by: Marco Fyfe Pietro Gillies, Goldsmiths, University of London, United Kingdom; Giulia Corno, Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IRCCS), Italy

                *Correspondence: Pietro Cipresso, p.cipresso@ 123456auxologico.it

                This article was submitted to Human-Media Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086
                6232426
                30459681
                897ab1eb-683e-4874-9ee9-34d5ad75e3f7
                Copyright © 2018 Cipresso, Giglioli, Raya and Riva.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 December 2017
                : 10 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 105, Pages: 20, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                virtual reality,augmented reality,quantitative psychology,measurement,psychometrics,scientometrics,computational psychometrics,mathematical psychology

                Comments

                Comment on this article