14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of palbociclib and ribociclib in patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive, HER2 receptor negative metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is scant data from India on efficacy and safety of palbociclib and ribociclib in routine clinical practice.

          Methods

          This retrospective, observational, single institution study included patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancers, who received palbociclib or ribociclib with any partner endocrine therapy in any line of treatment between January 2016 and June 2019. Data were analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

          Results

          The study included 101 female patients with median age of 57 (IQR 48–62) years, of whom 80 (79.2%) were postmenopausal, 79 (78.2%) received palbociclib or ribociclib in second- or later-line treatment, 59 (58.4%) received fulvestrant and 41 (40.6%) received an aromatase inhibitor. In first-line treatment, at a median follow-up of 21.7 (0.5–41.9) months, median PFS and OS were 21.1 (95%CI 16.36-not estimable) months and not reached, respectively. In second- or later-line setting, at a median follow-up of 17.2 (0.5–43.7) months, median PFS and OS were 5.98 (95%CI 4.96–7.89) months and 20.2 (95%CI 14.1-not estimable) months, respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 45 (45.0%) and 9 (9.0%) patients, respectively while dose reduction was required in 32 (31.7%) patients. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, first-line setting (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.25–0.97, p = 0.043) and ECOG performance status 1 (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.20–0.91, p = 0.028) were significantly associated with PFS while only ECOG PS 1 was significantly associated (HR 0.04, 95%CI 0.008–0.206, p = 0.000) with OS.

          Conclusion

          Palbociclib and ribociclib, when used in routine clinical practice in first or subsequent lines of treatment, resulted in efficacy and toxicity outcomes in concordance with those expected from pivotal trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.

          Background A phase 2 study showed that progression-free survival was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole than with letrozole alone in the initial treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. We performed a phase 3 study that was designed to confirm and expand the efficacy and safety data for palbociclib plus letrozole for this indication. Methods In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 666 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, who had not had prior treatment for advanced disease, to receive palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators; secondary end points were overall survival, objective response, clinical benefit response, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetic effects, and safety. Results The median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1 to not estimable) in the palbociclib-letrozole group, as compared with 14.5 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 17.1) in the placebo-letrozole group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72; P<0.001). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 66.4% of the patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group vs. 1.4% in the placebo-letrozole group), leukopenia (24.8% vs. 0%), anemia (5.4% vs. 1.8%), and fatigue (1.8% vs. 0.5%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 1.8% of patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in none of the patients in the placebo-letrozole group. Permanent discontinuation of any study treatment as a result of adverse events occurred in 43 patients (9.7%) in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in 13 patients (5.9%) in the placebo-letrozole group. Conclusions Among patients with previously untreated ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, palbociclib combined with letrozole resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than that with letrozole alone, although the rates of myelotoxic effects were higher with palbociclib-letrozole. (Funded by Pfizer; PALOMA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01740427 .).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer

            Background The inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) could potentially overcome or delay resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer that is positive for hormone receptor (HR) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Methods In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with letrozole for first-line treatment in 668 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced disease. We randomly assigned the patients to receive either ribociclib (600 mg per day on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg per day) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, overall response rate, and safety. A preplanned interim analysis was performed on January 29, 2016, after 243 patients had disease progression or died. Prespecified criteria for superiority required a hazard ratio of 0.56 or less with P<1.29×10(-5). Results The duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ribociclib group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.72; P=3.29×10(-6) for superiority). The median duration of follow-up was 15.3 months. After 18 months, the progression-free survival rate was 63.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6 to 70.3) in the ribociclib group and 42.2% (95% CI, 34.8 to 49.5) in the placebo group. In patients with measurable disease at baseline, the overall response rate was 52.7% and 37.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in more than 10% of the patients in either group were neutropenia (59.3% in the ribociclib group vs. 0.9% in the placebo group) and leukopenia (21.0% vs. 0.6%); the rates of discontinuation because of adverse events were 7.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Conclusions Among patients receiving initial systemic treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, the duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving ribociclib plus letrozole than among those receiving placebo plus letrozole, with a higher rate of myelosuppression in the ribociclib group. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01958021 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

              In the PALOMA-3 study, the combination of the CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor palbociclib and fulvestrant was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Identification of patients most suitable for the addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy after tumour recurrence is crucial for treatment optimisation in metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm our earlier findings with this extended follow-up and show our results for subgroup and biomarker analyses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                22 July 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 7
                : e0253722
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [2 ] Department of Biostatistics, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Sudeep Gupta is a member of the advisory board at the following institutions: Roche, Sanofi, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Biocon, Pfizer, Oncosten, Core Diagnostics, and Astrazeneca. Jyoti Bajpai is a member of the advisory board at Novartis. Seema Gulia is a member of the advisory board at Novartis and Eisai. Sudeep Gupta has received research funding from Roche, Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Celltrion, Oncosten, Novartis, Intas, Eisai, Biocon, and Astrazeneca. Sushmita Rath has received research funding from Astrazeneca and JSS clinical research. Seema Gulia has received research funding from Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc, Celltrion, Kendle India Pvt Ltd, and Zydus. Jyoti Bajpai has received research funding from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Paxman, and Sun Pharma. The authors received no specific funding for this work. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors would like to declare the following products associated with the theme of this research: palbociclib and ribociclib.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-6378
                Article
                PONE-D-21-03932
                10.1371/journal.pone.0253722
                8297817
                34292933
                894a3b8a-3e2b-4689-aa17-8ae9e82cef8b
                © 2021 Rath et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 February 2021
                : 10 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Endocrine Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Metastasis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Basic Cancer Research
                Metastasis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Toxicology
                Toxicity
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Toxicology
                Toxicity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Blood Cells
                White Blood Cells
                Neutropenia
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                Neutropenia
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                Neutropenia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Cells
                White Blood Cells
                Neutropenia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Breast Tumors
                Breast Cancer
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Hormones
                Estrogens
                Custom metadata
                There are federal Indian regulations on providing access to data for individuals outside the country. All such requests have to be cleared by the Indian Health Ministry Screening Committee. The de-identified data set will be provided to any interested researcher outside India after obtaining the required approval from the Health Ministry Screening Committee who can be contacted at hmscihdicmr@ 123456gmail.com . For researchers inside India the de-identified data can be provided with Institutional Ethics Committee approval. The Institutional Ethics Committee can be contacted at tmhethics@ 123456gmail.com .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                15
                3
                11
                4
                Smart Citations
                15
                3
                11
                4
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content646

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors338