6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Comprehensive Survey of Indoor Localization Methods Based on Computer Vision

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Computer vision based indoor localization methods use either an infrastructure of static cameras to track mobile entities (e.g., people, robots) or cameras attached to the mobile entities. Methods in the first category employ object tracking, while the others map images from mobile cameras with images acquired during a configuration stage or extracted from 3D reconstructed models of the space. This paper offers an overview of the computer vision based indoor localization domain, presenting application areas, commercial tools, existing benchmarks, and other reviews. It provides a survey of indoor localization research solutions, proposing a new classification based on the configuration stage (use of known environment data), sensing devices, type of detected elements, and localization method. It groups 70 of the most recent and relevant image based indoor localization methods according to the proposed classification and discusses their advantages and drawbacks. It highlights localization methods that also offer orientation information, as this is required by an increasing number of applications of indoor localization (e.g., augmented reality).

          Related collections

          Most cited references177

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Performance evaluation of local descriptors.

          In this paper, we compare the performance of descriptors computed for local interest regions, as, for example, extracted by the Harris-Affine detector. Many different descriptors have been proposed in the literature. It is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate and how their performance depends on the interest region detector. The descriptors should be distinctive and at the same time robust to changes in viewing conditions as well as to errors of the detector. Our evaluation uses as criterion recall with respect to precision and is carried out for different image transformations. We compare shape context, steerable filters, PCA-SIFT, differential invariants, spin images, SIFT, complex filters, moment invariants, and cross-correlation for different types of interest regions. We also propose an extension of the SIFT descriptor and show that it outperforms the original method. Furthermore, we observe that the ranking of the descriptors is mostly independent of the interest region detector and that the SIFT-based descriptors perform best. Moments and steerable filters show the best performance among the low dimensional descriptors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ORB-SLAM2: An Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Conference Proceedings: not found

              Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                06 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 20
                : 9
                : 2641
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania; alin.moldoveanu@ 123456cs.pub.ro (A.M.); irina.mocanu@ 123456cs.pub.ro (I.M.); florica.moldoveanu@ 123456cs.pub.ro (F.M.); emilian.radoi@ 123456cs.pub.ro (I.E.R.); victor.asavei@ 123456cs.pub.ro (V.A.); alex.gradinaru@ 123456cs.pub.ro (A.G.)
                [2 ]Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; alex@ 123456butean.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: anca.morar@ 123456cs.pub.ro
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-6862
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-7249
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-9344
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8357-5840
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-2542
                Article
                sensors-20-02641
                10.3390/s20092641
                7249029
                32384605
                892931a1-2228-4df4-80ec-639893dbe6d6
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 06 March 2020
                : 29 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                indoor localization,computer vision,qr codes,fiducial markers,3d reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article