Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Marriage and risk of dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Being married is associated with healthier lifestyle behaviours and lower mortality and may reduce risk for dementia due to life-course factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between marital status and the risk of developing dementia.

          Methods

          We searched medical databases and contacted experts in the field for relevant studies reporting the relationship, adjusted for age and sex, between marital status and dementia. We rated methodological quality and conducted random-effects meta-analyses to summarise relative risks of being widowed, divorced or lifelong single, compared with being married. Secondary stratified analyses with meta-regression examined the impact of clinical and social context and study methodology on findings.

          Results

          We included 15 studies with 812 047 participants. Compared with those who are married, lifelong single (relative risk=1.42 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.90)) and widowed (1.20 (1.02 to 1.41)) people have elevated risk of dementia. We did not find an association in divorced people.

          Further analyses showed that less education partially confounds the risk in widowhood and worse physical health the elevated risk in lifelong single people. Compared with studies that used clinical registers for ascertaining dementia diagnoses, those which clinically examined all participants found higher risk for being unmarried.

          Conclusions

          Being married is associated with reduced risk of dementia than widowed and lifelong single people, who are also underdiagnosed in routine clinical practice. Dementia prevention in unmarried people should focus on education and physical health and should consider the possible effect of social engagement as a modifiable risk factor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.

          It is unclear to what extent poor social relationships are related to the development of dementia. A comprehensive systematic literature search identified 19 longitudinal cohort studies investigating the association between various social relationship factors and incident dementia in the general population. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Low social participation (RR: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.13-1.75)), less frequent social contact (RR: 1.57 (95% CI: 1.32-1.85)), and more loneliness (RR: 1.58 (95% CI: 1.19-2.09)) were statistically significant associated with incident dementia. The results of the association between social network size and dementia were inconsistent. No statistically significant association was found for low satisfaction with social network and the onset of dementia (RR: 1.25 (95% CI: 0.96-1.62). We conclude that social relationship factors that represent a lack of social interaction are associated with incident dementia. The strength of the associations between poor social interaction and incident dementia is comparable with other well-established risk factors for dementia, including low education attainment, physical inactivity, and late-life depression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
                J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
                jnnp
                jnnp
                Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0022-3050
                1468-330X
                March 2018
                28 November 2017
                : 89
                : 3
                : 231-238
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDivision of Psychiatry , University College London , London, UK
                [2 ] Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [3 ] INSERM U 1018, Epidemiology of Ageing and Age-Related Diseases , Villejuif, France
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health , University College London , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Andrew Sommerlad, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7NF, UK; a.sommerlad@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-7055
                Article
                jnnp-2017-316274
                10.1136/jnnp-2017-316274
                5869449
                29183957
                89219540-842a-4a82-95e6-6adefe139d24
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 19 April 2017
                : 25 July 2017
                : 30 August 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust;
                Categories
                Cognition
                1506
                1507
                Research paper
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                editors-choice

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content736

                Cited by77