55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neonatal mortality and coverage of essential newborn interventions 2010 - 2013: a prospective, population-based study from low-middle income countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Approximately 3 million neonatal deaths occur each year worldwide. Simple interventions have been tested and found to be effective in reducing the neonatal mortality. In order to effectively implement public health interventions, it is important to know the rates of neonatal mortality and understand the contributing risk factors. Hence, this prospective, population-based, observational study was carried out to inform these needs.

          Methods

          The Global Network’s Maternal Newborn Health Registry was initiated in the seven sites in 2008. Registry administrators (RAs) attempt to identify and enroll all eligible women by 20 weeks gestation and collect basic health data, and outcomes after delivery and at 6 weeks post-partum. All study data were collected, reviewed, and edited by staff at each study site. The study was reviewed and approved by each sites’ ethics review committee.

          Results

          Overall, the 7-day neonatal mortality rate (NMR) was 20.6 per 1000 live births and the 28-day NMR was 25.7 per 1000 live births. Higher neonatal mortality was associated with maternal age > 35 and <20 years relative to women 20-35 years of age. Preterm births were at increased risk of both early and 28-day neonatal mortality (RR 8.1, 95% CI 7.5-8.8 and 7.5, 95% CI 6.9-8.1) compared to term as were those with low birth weight (<2500g). Neonatal resuscitation rates were 4.8% for hospital deliveries compared to 0.9% for home births. In the hospital, 26.5% of deliveries were by cesarean section with an overall cesarean section rate of 12.5%. Neonatal mortality rates were highest in the Pakistan site and lowest in Argentina.

          Conclusions

          Using prospectively collected data with high follow up rates (99%), we documented characteristics associated with neonatal mortality. Low birth weight and prematurity are among the strongest predictors of neonatal mortality. Other risk factors for neonatal deaths included male gender, multiple gestation and major congenital anomalies. Breech presentation/transverse lie, and no antenatal care were also significant risk factors for neonatal death. Coverage of interventions varied by setting of delivery, with the overall population rate of most evidence-based interventions low. This study informs about risk factors for neonatal mortality which can serve to design strategies/interventions to reduce risk of neonatal mortality.

          Trial registration

          The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT01073475

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Maternal and Newborn Health Registry Study of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research.

          To implement a vital statistics registry system to register pregnant women and document birth outcomes in the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research sites in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The Global Network sites began a prospective population-based pregnancy registry to identify all pregnant women and record pregnancy outcomes up to 42 days post-delivery in more than 100 defined low-resource geographic areas (clusters). Pregnant women were registered during pregnancy, with 42-day maternal and neonatal follow-up recorded-including care received during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Recorded outcomes included stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and maternal mortality rates. In 2010, 72848 pregnant women were enrolled and 6-week follow-up was obtained for 97.8%. Across sites, 40.7%, 24.8%, and 34.5% of births occurred in a hospital, health center, and home setting, respectively. The mean neonatal mortality rate was 23 per 1000 live births, ranging from 8.2 to 48.5 per 1000 live births. The mean stillbirth rate ranged from 13.7 to 54.4 per 1000 births. The registry is an ongoing study to assess the impact of interventions and trends regarding pregnancy outcomes and measures of care to inform public health. ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01073475. Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan.

            To evaluate the prevalence, sex distribution and causes of neonatal mortality, as well as its risk factors, in an urban Pakistani population with access to obstetric and neonatal care. Study area women were enrolled at 20-26 weeks' gestation in a prospective population-based cohort study that was conducted from 2003 to 2005. Physical examinations, antenatal laboratory tests and anthropometric measures were performed, and gestational age was determined by ultrasound to confirm eligibility. Demographic and health data were also collected on pretested study forms by trained female research staff. The women and neonates were seen again within 48 hours postpartum and at day 28 after the birth. All neonatal deaths were reviewed using the Pattinson et al. system to assign obstetric and final causes of death; the circumstances of the death were determined by asking the mother or family and by reviewing hospital records. Frequencies and rates were calculated, and 95% confidence intervals were determined for mortality rates. Relative risks were calculated to evaluate the associations between potential risk factors and neonatal death. Logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted odds ratios. Birth outcomes were ascertained for 1280 (94%) of the 1369 women enrolled. The 28-day neonatal mortality rate was 47.3 per 1000 live births. Preterm birth, Caesarean section and intrapartum complications were associated with neonatal death. Some 45% of the deaths occurred within 48 hours and 73% within the first week. The primary obstetric causes of death were preterm labour (34%) and intrapartum asphyxia (21%). Final causes were classified as immaturity-related (26%), birth asphyxia or hypoxia (26%) and infection (23%). Neither delivery in a health facility nor by health professionals was associated with fewer neonatal deaths. The Caesarean section rate was 19%. Almost all (88%) neonates who died received treatment and 75% died in the hospital. In an urban population with good access to professional care, we found a high neonatal mortality rate, often due to preventable conditions. These results suggest that, to decrease neonatal mortality, improved health service quality is crucial.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Four million neonatal deaths: counting and attribution of cause of death.

              Each year there are an estimated four million neonatal deaths and at least 3.2 million stillbirths. Three-quarters of the world's neonatal deaths are counted only through five-yearly retrospective household surveys. Without these surveys we would have no data, but limitations remain particularly in detecting deaths on the first day of life. Comparable reliable neonatal cause of death data through vital registration are available for less than 5% of the world's neonatal deaths, necessitating modelled estimates for the majority of the world. Improving the quantity, quality and frequency of data for numbers and causes of neonatal deaths is essential to effectively guide the increasing investments to reduce these deaths. Advancing the data requires general investment in information systems and specific improvements of tools and methods for both household surveys and verbal autopsy, particularly the use of consistent case definitions and hierarchical attribution of cause of death. An important paradigm shift is from historical categories for cause of death ('perinatal causes') to programmatic categories which are consistent with the International Classification of Diseases. If neonatal deaths remain uncounted, they cannot count in policy and in programmes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central
                1742-4755
                2015
                8 June 2015
                : 12
                : Suppl 2
                : S6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Women's and Children's Health Research Unit, KLE University's Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
                [2 ]University Teaching Hospital, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
                [3 ]Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE, USA
                [4 ]RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
                [5 ]Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
                [6 ]Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [7 ]Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya
                [8 ]Fundación para la Alimentación y Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá (FANCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
                [9 ]Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [10 ]Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
                [11 ]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
                [12 ]Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
                [13 ]Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                [14 ]Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
                [15 ]University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                Article
                1742-4755-12-S2-S6
                10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S6
                4464215
                26063125
                8905526a-0397-44b0-ae07-906a3edc1a23
                Copyright © 2015 Dhaded et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Research

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                neonatal mortality,newborn care,risk factors
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                neonatal mortality, newborn care, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article