ORIENTATION: Extreme competition among institutions of higher learning was one of the difficulties that universities of technology (UoTs) had to overcome in order to enter the higher education system. This study examined the influence of training and development on job satisfaction, loyalty and retention among academic staff at a selected university of technology RESEARCH PURPOSE: The study investigated how training and development impact job satisfaction, loyalty and retention among academics MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY: The competitive nature of the academic sector inspired universities to strive to attract and retain talented faculty members. Training and development programmes are considered potential tools to enhance job satisfaction, loyalty and retention, but empirical evidence is needed to support this relationship RESEARCH APPROACH/DESIGN AND METHOD: This study used a quantitative research methodology with a non-probability convenience sample (n = 270) of academics within the selected university utilising self-administered structured questionnaires to collect data MAIN FINDINGS: The regression analysis revealed positive significant predictive relationships between training and development programmes and job satisfaction, loyalty and retention among academic staff PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: Findings imply that universities should prioritise the development of tailored training initiatives that address the specific needs and aspirations of their academic staff. Training interventions can foster a positive work environment and enhance staff members' commitment and long-term engagement, ultimately improving the overall quality and reputation of the institution CONTRIBUTION/VALUE-ADD: The study provided evidence-based insights to inform policies related to training and development programmes for both academics and institutions of higher education administrators
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.