0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      When he smiles: Attractiveness preferences for male faces expressing emotions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          The impact of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness has been controversial owing to contradictory results, particularly in studies on female preferences. Given that sexually dimorphic facial features, especially more masculine ones, have been previously related to the perception of anger, we investigated the bi-directional influence of emotional expressions and facial masculinity and explored their impact on women's preferences for facial masculinity. We confirmed the effect of facial sexual dimorphism on the perception of emotional cues (happiness and anger) and explored whether smiling or angry expressions influence women's perception of masculinity in male faces. Additionally, we examined women's preferences for emotionally expressive male faces altered along a continuum of masculinity. The results showed that masculinised faces are perceived as angrier, while feminised faces are perceived as happier (Experiment 1), and that angry faces are perceived as more masculine when compared with happy faces (Experiment 2). It is noteworthy that our Experiment 3 uncovered a pivotal finding: women prefer reduced feminisation in happy faces compared with neutral/angry faces. This suggests that the avoidance response observed towards masculinity is attenuated by a smiling expression. The current study introduces a new perspective to be considered when exploring the role of facial masculinity in women's attractiveness preferences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The functional basis of face evaluation.

          People automatically evaluate faces on multiple trait dimensions, and these evaluations predict important social outcomes, ranging from electoral success to sentencing decisions. Based on behavioral studies and computer modeling, we develop a 2D model of face evaluation. First, using a principal components analysis of trait judgments of emotionally neutral faces, we identify two orthogonal dimensions, valence and dominance, that are sufficient to describe face evaluation and show that these dimensions can be approximated by judgments of trustworthiness and dominance. Second, using a data-driven statistical model for face representation, we build and validate models for representing face trustworthiness and face dominance. Third, using these models, we show that, whereas valence evaluation is more sensitive to features resembling expressions signaling whether the person should be avoided or approached, dominance evaluation is more sensitive to features signaling physical strength/weakness. Fourth, we show that important social judgments, such as threat, can be reproduced as a function of the two orthogonal dimensions of valence and dominance. The findings suggest that face evaluation involves an overgeneralization of adaptive mechanisms for inferring harmful intentions and the ability to cause harm and can account for rapid, yet not necessarily accurate, judgments from faces.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.

              What makes a face attractive and why do we have the preferences we do? Emergence of preferences early in development and cross-cultural agreement on attractiveness challenge a long-held view that our preferences reflect arbitrary standards of beauty set by cultures. Averageness, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism are good candidates for biologically based standards of beauty. A critical review and meta-analyses indicate that all three are attractive in both male and female faces and across cultures. Theorists have proposed that face preferences may be adaptations for mate choice because attractive traits signal important aspects of mate quality, such as health. Others have argued that they may simply be by-products of the way brains process information. Although often presented as alternatives, I argue that both kinds of selection pressures may have shaped our perceptions of facial beauty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysis
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Evol Hum Sci
                Evol Hum Sci
                EHS
                Evolutionary Human Sciences
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2513-843X
                2023
                14 November 2023
                : 5
                : e31
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
                [2 ]Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Aveiro , Aveiro, Portugal
                [3 ]School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews , St Andrews, UK
                [4 ]William James Center for Research, Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Aveiro , Aveiro, Portugal
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: David I. Perrett; E-mail: dp@ 123456st-andrews.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-5319
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-0939
                Article
                S2513843X23000282
                10.1017/ehs.2023.28
                10753340
                38155757
                88e99861-c0ba-4aee-84e2-bf9556c4d19a
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 July 2023
                : 04 October 2023
                : 06 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, References: 58, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research Article

                face attractiveness,sexual dimorphism,masculinity,emotional expression

                Comments

                Comment on this article