Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risks and Benefits of Using Social Media in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Dermatological information on social media is often presented by nondermatologists. Increasing the online engagement of trained dermatologists may improve information quality, patient education, and care.

          Objective

          Our study assesses dermatologists’ perceptions of social media and patterns of use to identify barriers limiting engagement.

          Methods

          In our cohort study, a 36-item online survey was distributed to dermatologists in the United States; responses were captured on a 1-100 sliding scale.

          Results

          Of 166 initiated surveys, 128 valid responses were submitted. Dermatologists showed greater concern for social media risk-related issues (mean 77.9, SD 15.1) than potential benefits (mean 61.8, SD 16.4; P<.001). Leading concerns were poor patient care, nonevidence-based information, and breaching patient privacy. Benefits included interphysician collaboration, patient education, and public health awareness. The most avid and enthusiastic social media users were millennials (mean total optimism score 67.5, SD 14.9) and baby boomers (mean total optimism score 63.1, SD 11.2) compared with Generation X dermatologists (mean total optimism score 52.2, SD 16.3, P<.001). Of 128 dermatologists, 103 (82.4%) plan on increasing their social media use ( P=.003). Predictors showing an intent to increase future social media use were younger age, integration into professional use, and an optimistic view (r2=.39; P<.001).

          Conclusions

          Dermatologists perceive the risk of social media to be considerable but still intend to increase its use, likely recognizing the value and importance of social media to the field.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

          Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a “representative” sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The spread of true and false news online

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals

              Background Since the emergence of social media in 2004, a growing percentage of patients use this technology for health related reasons. To reflect on the alleged beneficial and potentially harmful effects of social media use by patients, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the extant literature on the effects of social media use for health related reasons on patients and their relationship with healthcare professionals. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review on empirical research regarding the effects of social media use by patients for health related reasons. The papers we included met the following selection criteria: (1) published in a peer-reviewed journal, (2) written in English, (3) full text available to the researcher, (4) contain primary empirical data, (5) the users of social media are patients, (6) the effects of patients using social media are clearly stated, (7) satisfy established quality criteria. Results Initially, a total of 1,743 articles were identified from which 22 were included in the study. From these articles six categories of patients’ use of social media were identified, namely: emotional, information, esteem, network support, social comparison and emotional expression. The types of use were found to lead to seven identified types of effects on patients, namely improved self-management and control, enhanced psychological well-being, and enhanced subjective well-being, diminished subjective well-being, addiction to social media, loss of privacy, and being targeted for promotion. Social media use by patients was found to affect the healthcare professional and patient relationship, by leading to more equal communication between the patient and healthcare professional, increased switching of doctors, harmonious relationships, and suboptimal interaction between the patient and healthcare professional. Conclusions Our review provides insights into the emerging utilization of social media in healthcare. In particular, it identifies types of use by patients as well as the effects of such use, which may differ between patients and doctors. Accordingly, our results framework and propositions can serve to guide future research, and they also have practical implications for healthcare providers and policy makers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Dermatol
                JMIR Dermatol
                JDERM
                JMIR Dermatology
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2562-0959
                Jan-Jun 2021
                24 February 2021
                : 4
                : 1
                : e24737
                Affiliations
                [1 ] New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine Old Westbury, NY United States
                [2 ] Department of Dermatology Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Richmond Hill, NY United States
                [3 ] Department of Psychiatry South Oaks Hospital Amityville, NY United States
                [4 ] Ronald O Perelman Department of Dermatology New York University New York, NY United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: John G Zampella John.zampella@ 123456nyulangone.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2883-4982
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-9300
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-3121
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-5622
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-4567
                Article
                v4i1e24737
                10.2196/24737
                10334963
                37632799
                88dac1a0-8663-4f21-9fb8-d4a4ab187529
                ©Moshe Y Bressler, Eugene Grudnikoff, Yaakov Bressler, Rebecca Tamez, John G Zampella. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 24.02.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 7 October 2020
                : 24 November 2020
                : 27 January 2021
                : 31 January 2021
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                social media,dermatologist,generational differences,instagram,facebook,information quality,patient education,online content,risk,benefit,dermatology,cross-sectional,survey,online health information

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content263

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors190