8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machine-learning, MRI bone shape and important clinical outcomes in osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Osteoarthritis (OA) structural status is imperfectly classified using radiographic assessment. Statistical shape modelling (SSM), a form of machine-learning, provides precise quantification of a characteristic 3D OA bone shape. We aimed to determine the benefits of this novel measure of OA status for assessing risks of clinically important outcomes.

          Methods

          The study used 4796 individuals from the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort. SSM-derived femur bone shape (B-score) was measured from all 9433 baseline knee MRIs. We examined the relationship between B-score, radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) and current and future pain and function as well as total knee replacement (TKR) up to 8 years.

          Results

          B-score repeatability supported 40 discrete grades. KLG and B-score were both associated with risk of current and future pain, functional limitation and TKR; logistic regression curves were similar. However, each KLG included a wide range of B-scores. For example, for KLG3, risk of pain was 34.4 (95% CI 31.7 to 37.0)%, but B-scores within KLG3 knees ranged from 0 to 6; for B-score 0, risk was 17.0 (16.1 to 17.9)% while for B-score 6, it was 52.1 (48.8 to 55.4)%. For TKR, KLG3 risk was 15.3 (13.3 to 17.3)%; while B-score 0 had negligible risk, B-score 6 risk was 35.6 (31.8 to 39.6)%. Age, sex and body mass index had negligible effects on association between B-score and symptoms.

          Conclusions

          B-score provides reader-independent quantification using a single time-point, providing unambiguous OA status with defined clinical risks across the whole range of disease including pre-radiographic OA. B-score heralds a step-change in OA stratification for interventions and improved personalised assessment, analogous to the T-score in osteoporosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Osteoarthritis.

          Osteoarthritis is a major source of pain, disability, and socioeconomic cost worldwide. The epidemiology of the disorder is complex and multifactorial, with genetic, biological, and biomechanical components. Aetiological factors are also joint specific. Joint replacement is an effective treatment for symptomatic end-stage disease, although functional outcomes can be poor and the lifespan of prostheses is limited. Consequently, the focus is shifting to disease prevention and the treatment of early osteoarthritis. This task is challenging since conventional imaging techniques can detect only quite advanced disease and the relation between pain and structural degeneration is not close. Nevertheless, advances in both imaging and biochemical markers offer potential for diagnosis and as outcome measures for new treatments. Joint-preserving interventions under development include lifestyle modification and pharmaceutical and surgical modalities. Some show potential, but at present few have proven ability to arrest or delay disease progression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee.

              To report on the process and criteria for selecting acquisition protocols to include in the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study protocol for the knee. Candidate knee MR acquisition protocols identified from the literature were first optimized at 3Tesla (T). Twelve knees from 10 subjects were scanned one time with each of 16 acquisitions considered most likely to achieve the study goals and having the best optimization results. The resultant images and multi-planar reformats were evaluated for artifacts and structural discrimination of articular cartilage at the cartilage-fluid, cartilage-fat, cartilage-capsule, cartilage-meniscus and cartilage-cartilage interfaces. The five acquisitions comprising the final OAI MRI protocol were assembled based on the study goals for the imaging protocol, the image evaluation results and the need to image both knees within a 75 min time slot, including positioning. For quantitative cartilage morphometry, fat-suppressed, 3D dual-echo in steady state (DESS) acquisitions appear to provide the best universal cartilage discrimination. The OAI knee MRI protocol provides imaging data on multiple articular structures and features relevant to knee OA that will support a broad range of existing and anticipated measurement methods while balancing requirements for high image quality and consistency against the practical considerations of a large multi-center cohort study. Strengths of the final knee MRI protocol include cartilage quantification capabilities in three planes due to multi-planar reconstruction of a thin slice, high spatial resolution 3D DESS acquisition and the multiple, non-fat-suppressed image contrasts measured during the T2 relaxation time mapping acquisition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Rheum Dis
                Ann Rheum Dis
                annrheumdis
                ard
                Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0003-4967
                1468-2060
                April 2021
                13 November 2020
                : 80
                : 4
                : 502-508
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Imorphics Ltd , Manchester, UK
                [2 ] BioBridges , Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA
                [3 ] departmentLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre , University of Leeds School of Medicine , Leeds, UK
                [4 ] departmentClinical Research and Medical Affairs , Flexion Therapeutics. Inc , Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Philip G Conaghan, Rheumatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK; p.conaghan@ 123456leeds.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-5665
                Article
                annrheumdis-2020-217160
                10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217160
                7958089
                33188042
                88450d48-dd3d-4099-887e-02bf4f5ebb22
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 February 2020
                : 21 October 2020
                : 23 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: Programme Grant EP/P001076/1
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012041, Versus Arthritis;
                Award ID: 20083
                Award ID: 20194
                Award ID: 20800
                Funded by: Flexion Therapeutics;
                Funded by: Imorphics Ltd, Manchester;
                Categories
                Osteoarthritis
                1506
                2311
                2497
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Immunology
                osteoarthritis,magnetic resonance imaging,knee osteoarthritis
                Immunology
                osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging, knee osteoarthritis

                Comments

                Comment on this article