Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is of paramount relevance. Traditional vision screening (conducted in <3 years) is related with difficulty in getting cooperation from a subject to conduct the eye exam, so accurate objective methods to improve amblyopia detection are necessary. Handheld devices used for photoscreening or autorefraction could offer advantages to improve amblyopia screening because they reduce exploration time to just few seconds, no subject collaboration is needed, and they provide objective information. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main functions and clinical applicability of commercially available devices for early detection of amblyopia and to describe their differences, advantages, and limitations. Although the studies reviewed are heterogeneous (due to wide differences in referral criteria, use of different risk factors, different types of samples studied, etc), these devices provide objective measures in a quick and objective way with a simple outcome report: retest, pass, or refer. However, due to major limitations, these devices are not recommended, and their use in clinical practice is limited.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Instrument-based pediatric vision screening policy statement.

          A policy statement describing the use of automated vision screening technology (instrument-based vision screening) is presented. Screening for amblyogenic refractive error with instrument-based screening is not dependent on behavioral responses of children, as when visual acuity is measured. Instrument-based screening is quick, requires minimal cooperation of the child, and is especially useful in the preverbal, preliterate, or developmentally delayed child. Children younger than 4 years can benefit from instrument-based screening, and visual acuity testing can be used reliably in older children. Adoption of this new technology is highly dependent on third-party payment policies, which could present a significant barrier to adoption.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.

            To evaluate the performance of the autorefractor Retinomax K-plus2 and the photoscreener plusoptiX S08 in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy (CR) and to assess limitations associated with their use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.

              To compare refractive data and testability of Spot (PediaVision) and Plusoptix A09 (Plusoptix, Inc) photoscreeners and to compare each device with traditional cycloplegic retinoscopy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clinical Ophthalmology
                Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove Medical Press
                1177-5467
                1177-5483
                2016
                22 July 2016
                : 10
                : 1365-1373
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Theoretical Physics, Atomic and Optics, School of Optometry
                [2 ]Optometry Research Group, IOBA-Eye Institute, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
                [3 ]Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Victoria de Juan, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo, km 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain, Tel +34 983 18 4853, Email victoriadejuanryc@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                opth-10-1365
                10.2147/OPTH.S93714
                4969043
                27555744
                88369a48-e2ee-4bd1-a201-6d88017e9be1
                © 2016 Sanchez et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                handheld photoscreener,photoscreening,binocular autorefraction,amblyopia screening

                Comments

                Comment on this article