5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Measuring Well-Being : A Review of Instruments

      , ,
      The Counseling Psychologist
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of life satisfaction.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five well-being scale

              The health status questionnaire Short‐Form 36 (SF‐36) includes subscales measuring both physical health and mental health. Psychometrically, the mental health subscale contains a mixture of mental symptoms and psychological well‐being items, among other things, to prevent a ceiling effect when used in general population studies. Three of the mental health well‐being items are also included in the WHO‐Five well‐being scale. In a Danish general population study, the mental health subscale was compared psychometrically with the WHO‐Five in order to evaluate the ceiling effect. Tests for unidimensionality were used in the psychometric analyses, and the sensitivity of the scales in differentiating between changes in self‐reported health over the past year has been tested. The results of the study on 9,542 respondents showed that, although the WHO‐Five and the mental health subscale were found to be unidimensional, the WHO‐Five had a significantly lower ceiling effect than the mental health subscale. The analysis identified the three depression symptoms in the mental health subscale as responsible for the ceiling effect. The WHO‐Five was also found to be significantly superior to the mental health subscale in terms of its sensitivity in differentiating between those persons whose health had deteriorated over the past year and those whose health had not. In conclusion, the WHO‐Five, which measures psychological well‐being, reflects aspects other than just the absence of depressive symptoms. Copyright © 2003 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Counseling Psychologist
                The Counseling Psychologist
                SAGE Publications
                0011-0000
                1552-3861
                August 05 2016
                August 05 2016
                : 44
                : 5
                : 730-757
                Article
                10.1177/0011000016633507
                38832291
                87fa2c20-1b72-4e48-bc61-d2a62bce93d7
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article