28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global update on the susceptibility of human influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors, 2015–2016

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Four World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centres for Reference and Research on Influenza and one WHO Collaborating Centre for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control of Influenza (WHO CCs) assessed antiviral susceptibility of 14,330 influenza A and B viruses collected by WHO-recognized National Influenza Centres (NICs) between May 2015 and May 2016. Neuraminidase (NA) inhibition assay was used to determine 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50) data for NA inhibitors (NAIs) oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir and laninamivir. Furthermore, NA sequences from 13,484 influenza viruses were retrieved from public sequence databases and screened for amino acid substitutions (AAS) associated with reduced inhibition (RI) or highly reduced inhibition (HRI) by NAIs. Of the viruses tested by WHO CCs 93% were from three WHO regions: Western Pacific, the Americas and Europe. Approximately 0.8% (n = 113) exhibited either RI or HRI by at least one of four NAIs.

          As in previous seasons, the most common NA AAS was H275Y in A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, which confers HRI by oseltamivir and peramivir. Two A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses carried a rare NA AAS, S247R, shown in this study to confer RI/HRI by the four NAIs. The overall frequency of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses containing NA AAS associated with RI/HRI was approximately 1.8% (125/6915), which is slightly higher than in the previous 2014-15 season (0.5%). Three B/Victoria-lineage viruses contained a new AAS, NA H134N, which conferred HRI by zanamivir and laninamivir, and borderline HRI by peramivir. A single B/Victoria-lineage virus harboured NA G104E, which was associated with HRI by all four NAIs. The overall frequency of RI/HRI phenotype among type B viruses was approximately 0.6% (43/7677), which is lower than that in the previous season.

          Overall, the vast majority (>99%) of the viruses tested by WHO CCs were susceptible to all four NAIs, showing normal inhibition (NI). Hence, NAIs remain the recommended antivirals for treatment of influenza virus infections. Nevertheless, our data indicate that it is prudent to continue drug susceptibility monitoring using both NAI assay and sequence analysis.

          Highlights

          • A total of 14,330 influenza viruses were collected worldwide, May 2015–May 2016.

          • Approximately 0.8% showed reduced inhibition by at least one NA inhibitor.

          • The frequency of viruses with reduced inhibition was slightly higher than in 2014–15 (0.5%).

          • NA inhibitors remain an appropriate choice for influenza treatment.

          • Global surveillance of influenza antiviral susceptibility should be continued.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Meetings of the WHO working group on surveillance of influenza antiviral susceptibility – Geneva, November 2011 and June 2012.

          (2012)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The origin and global emergence of adamantane resistant A/H3N2 influenza viruses

            Resistance to the adamantane class of antiviral drugs by human A/H3N2 influenza viruses currently exceeds 90% in the United States and multiple Asian countries. Adamantane resistance is associated with a single amino acid change (S31N) in the M2 protein, which was shown to rapidly disseminate globally in 2005 in association with a genome reassortment event. However, the exact origin of influenza A/H3N2 viruses carrying the S31N mutation has not been characterized, particularly in South-East Asia. We therefore conducted a phylogenetic analysis of the HA, NA, and M1/2 segments of viral isolates collected between 1997 and 2007 from temperate localities in the Northern hemisphere (New York State, United States, 492 isolates) and Southern hemisphere (New Zealand and Australia, 629 isolates) and a subtropical locality in South-East Asia (Hong Kong, 281 isolates). We find that although the S31N mutation was independently introduced at least 11 times, the vast majority of resistant viruses now circulating globally descend from a single introduction that was first detected in the summer of 2003 in Hong Kong. These resistant viruses were continually detected in Hong Kong throughout 2003–2005, acquired a novel HA through reassortment during the first part of 2005, and thereafter spread globally. The emergence and persistence of adamantane resistant viruses in Hong Kong further supports a source-sink model of global influenza virus ecology, in which South-East Asia experiences continuous viral activity and repeatedly seeds epidemics in temperate areas.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global update on the susceptibility of human influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors, 2014–2015

              The World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centres for Reference and Research on Influenza (WHO CCs) tested 13,312 viruses collected by WHO recognized National Influenza Centres between May 2014 and May 2015 to determine 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) data for neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir and laninamivir. Ninety-four per cent of the viruses tested by the WHO CCs were from three WHO regions: Western Pacific, the Americas and Europe. Approximately 0.5% (n = 68) of viruses showed either highly reduced inhibition (HRI) or reduced inhibition (RI) (n = 56) against at least one of the four NAIs. Of the twelve viruses with HRI, six were A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, three were A(H3N2) viruses and three were B/Yamagata-lineage viruses. The overall frequency of viruses with RI or HRI by the NAIs was lower than that observed in 2013–14 (1.9%), but similar to the 2012–13 period (0.6%). Based on the current analysis, the NAIs remain an appropriate choice for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza virus infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Antiviral Res
                Antiviral Res
                Antiviral Research
                Elsevier
                0166-3542
                1872-9096
                1 October 2017
                October 2017
                : 146
                : 12-20
                Affiliations
                [a ]WHO Collaborating Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control of Influenza, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton RD NE, MS-G16, Atlanta, GA, 30329, United States
                [b ]Global Influenza Programme, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
                [c ]The Francis Crick Institute, Worldwide Influenza Centre (WIC), WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom
                [d ]WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Collaboration Innovation Centre for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, China CDC, Beijing, China
                [e ]WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
                [f ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
                [g ]National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, NW9 5HT, United Kingdom
                [h ]Public Health Laboratory Centre, 382 Nam Cheong Street, Hong Kong, China
                [i ]Division of Health Emergencies and Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [j ]Influenza Pathogenesis and Antiviral Resistance Laboratory, National Institute of Health, Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016, Lisboa, Portugal
                [k ]Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof Gama Pinto, 1649-016, Lisboa, Portugal
                [l ]National Influenza Center, Laboratorio de Virus Respiratorios, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [m ]WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Gakuen 4-7-1, Musashimurayama, Tokyo, 208-0011, Japan
                [n ]National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS-G16, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.1600 Clifton Rd NEMS-G16AtlantaGA30329USA lgubareva@ 123456cdc.gov
                Article
                S0166-3542(17)30267-X
                10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.08.004
                5667636
                28802866
                87d567e3-8361-424f-9e84-0b91d4809b48
                © 2017 The Francis Crick Institute

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 April 2017
                : 25 July 2017
                : 8 August 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                neuraminidase,inhibitor,susceptibility,surveillance,resistance,markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article