Tratamiento concomitante con gemcitabina y radioterapia en pacientes con carcinoma epidermoide locorregionalmente avanzado de cabeza y cuello: Estudio fase II  <span class="so-article-trans-title" dir="auto"> Translated title: Concomitant treatment with Gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with stages of epidermoid carcinoma originating in the head and neck: A phase II study </span>

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Antecedentes: En casos avanzados el tratamiento clásico del carcinoma epidermoide originado en mucosas de cabeza y cuello es cirugía-radioterapia o radioterapia sola (RTS). Sin embargo los resultados en carcinoma localmente avanzado (CLA) son decepcionantes. La asociación quimioterapia-radioterapia (QT-RT) ha demostrado ser superior a RTS en enfermedad irresecable y, en enfermedad resecable podría sustituir a la cirugía inicial y dejarla como rescate. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es conocer la tasa de respuesta y la toxicidad del tratamiento concomitante Gemcitabina-Radioterapia (GRT) en pacientes con CLA. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo en el que pacientes con CLA recibieron GRT concomitante; se evaluó la tasa de respuesta global, completa, parcial y la toxicidad. Se incluyeron 15 pacientes, 5 mujeres y 10 hombres, 73% en etapa IVa. Resultados: Trece de 15 pacientes tuvieron respuesta global (87%), en 9(60%) fue completa (RC) y 2 tuvieron progresión. Todos tuvieron toxicidad, la más frecuente fue mucositis grado 4 en 46%; de éstos 40% requirió apoyo nutricio por sonda o gastrostomía. Un paciente en RC murió por sepsis. Ninguno abandonó el tratamiento. Conclusiones: La asociación GRT ofrece tasa de respuesta completa en 60%; sin embargo, la morbilidad no es despreciable; se requieren estudios aleatorizados con mayor número de pacientes que permitan definir el mejor esquema terapéutico.

Translated abstract

Background: Surgery, radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone (RTA) constitute conventional treatment regimes for advanced stages of squamous cell carcinoma originating in the head and neck mucosa. Nevertheless, the results in advanced regional carcinoma (ARC) are disappointing. The chemotherapy - radiotherapy (CHT - RT) association has shown to be superior to RTA in irresectable disease and in resectable disease it could substitute initial surgery as a rescue alternative. Objective: Our objective is to report the response rate and toxicity of concurrent treatment with Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy (GRT) in patients with ARC. In a prospective design, patients with ARC received concurrent GRT; the global, complete and partial response rate as well as toxicity were assessed. Material and Methods: 15 patients were included, 5 women and 10 men, 73% in stage IVa; 13/15 showed a global response (87%), a complete response was observed in 9 cases (60%) (RC) and 2 showed progress. Results: All patients included showed toxicity, the most frequent one was level 4 mucositis in 46%, of this 40% required nutritional support by catheter or gastrostomy. One patient in RC died due to sepsis. None of them suspended treatment. Conclusion: The GRT association offers a complete response rate of 60%; nevertheless morbidity was not insignificant; randomized studies with a larger number of patients will be required to allow us to outline the optimal therapeutic scheme.

Related collections

Most cited references 30

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer.

J Pignon, J. Bourhis, C Domenge … (2000)

Despite more than 70 randomised trials, the effect of chemotherapy on non-metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma remains uncertain. We did three meta-analyses of the impact of survival on chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment. We updated data on all patients in randomised trials between 1965 and 1993. We included patients with carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity, larynx, or hypopharynx. The main meta-analysis of 63 trials (10,741 patients) of locoregional treatment with or without chemotherapy yielded a pooled hazard ratio of death of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94, p<0.0001), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 4% at 2 and 5 years in favour of chemotherapy. There was no significant benefit associated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy given concomitantly to radiotherapy gave significant benefits, but heterogeneity of the results prohibits firm conclusions. Meta-analysis of six trials (861 patients) comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with concomitant or alternating radiochemotherapy yielded a hazard ratio of 0.91 (0.79-1.06) in favour of concomitant or alternating radiochemotherapy. Three larynx-preservation trials (602 patients) compared radical surgery plus radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in responders or radical surgery and radiotherapy in non-responders. The hazard ratio of death in the chemotherapy arm as compared with the control arm was 1.19 (0.97-1.46). Because the main meta-analysis showed only a small significant survival benefit in favour of chemotherapy, the routine use of chemotherapy is debatable. For larynx preservation, the non-significant negative effect of chemotherapy in the organ-preservation strategy indicates that this procedure must remain investigational.

0 comments Cited 223 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT?

A J Balm, Eugène M F Damen, Frank Pameijer … (2004)

To identify the anatomic structures whose damage or malfunction cause late dysphagia and aspiration after intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancer, and to explore whether they can be spared by intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) without compromising target RT. A total of 26 patients receiving RT concurrent with gemcitabine, a regimen associated with a high rate of late dysphagia and aspiration, underwent prospective evaluation of swallowing with videofluoroscopy (VF), direct endoscopy, and CT. To assess whether the VF abnormalities were regimen specific, they were compared with the VF findings of 6 patients presenting with dysphagia after RT concurrent with high-dose intra-arterial cisplatin. The anatomic structures whose malfunction was likely to cause each of the VF abnormalities common to both regimens were determined by literature review. Pre- and posttherapy CT scans were reviewed for evidence of posttherapy damage to each of these structures, and those demonstrating posttherapy changes were deemed dysphagia/aspiration-related structures (DARS). Standard three-dimensional (3D) RT, standard IMRT (stIMRT), and dysphagia-optimized IMRT (doIMRT) plans in which sparing of the DARS was included in the optimization cost function, were produced for each of 20 consecutive patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer. The posttherapy VF abnormalities common to both regimens included weakness of the posterior motion of the base of tongue, prolonged pharyngeal transit time, lack of coordination between the swallowing phases, reduced elevation of the larynx, and reduced laryngeal closure and epiglottic inversion, contributing to a high rate of aspiration. The anatomic structures whose malfunction was the likely cause of each of these abnormalities, and that also demonstrated anatomic changes after RT concurrent with gemcitabine doses associated with dysphagia and aspiration, were the pharyngeal constrictor muscles (median thickness near midline 2.5 mm before therapy vs. 7 mm after therapy; p = 0.001), the supraglottic larynx (median thickness, 2 mm before therapy vs. 4 mm after therapy; p or =50 Gy (V(50)) was, therefore, a planning and evaluation goal. Compared with the 3D plans, stIMRT reduced the V(50) of the pharyngeal constrictors by 10% on average (range, 0-36%, p < 0.001), and doIMRT reduced these volumes further, by an additional 10% on average (range, 0-38%; p <0.001). The V(50) of the larynx (glottic + supraglottic) was reduced marginally by stIMRT compared with 3D (by 7% on average, range, 0-56%; p = 0.054), and doIMRT reduced these volumes by an additional 11%, on average (range, 0-41%; p = 0.002). doIMRT reduced laryngeal V(50) compared with 3D, by 18% on average (range 0-61%; p = 0.001). Certain target delineation rules facilitated sparing of the DARS by IMRT. The maximal DARS doses were not reduced by IMRT because of their partial overlap with the targets. stIMRT and doIMRT did not differ in target doses, parotid gland mean dose, spinal cord, or nonspecified tissue maximal dose. The structures whose damage may cause dysphagia and aspiration after intensive chemotherapy and RT are the pharyngeal constrictors and the glottic and supraglottic larynx. Compared with 3D-RT, moderate sparing of these structures was achieved by stIMRT, and an additional benefit, whose extent varied among the patients, was gained by doIMRT, without compromising target doses. Clinical validation is required to determine whether the dosimetric gains are translated into clinical ones.

0 comments Cited 106 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

W Richtsmeier, S. George, R K Scher … (1998)

Radiotherapy is often the primary treatment for advanced head and neck cancer, but the rates of locoregional recurrence are high and survival is poor. We investigated whether hyperfractionated irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy (combined treatment) is superior to hyperfractionated irradiation alone. Patients with advanced head and neck cancer who were treated only with hyperfractionated irradiation received 125 cGy twice daily, for a total of 7500 cGy. Patients in the combined-treatment group received 125 cGy twice daily, for a total of 7000 cGy, and five days of treatment with 12 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area per day and 600 mg of fluorouracil per square meter per day during weeks 1 and 6 of irradiation. Two cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil were given to most patients after the completion of radiotherapy. Of 122 patients who underwent randomization, 116 were included in the analysis. Most patients in both treatment groups had unresectable disease. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 19 to 86). At three years the rate of overall survival was 55 percent in the combined-therapy group and 34 percent in the hyperfractionation group (P=0.07). The relapse-free survival rate was higher in the combined-treatment group (61 percent vs. 41 percent, P=0.08). The rate of locoregional control of disease at three years was 70 percent in the combined-treatment group and 44 percent in the hyperfractionation group (P=0.01). Confluent mucositis developed in 77 percent and 75 percent of the two groups, respectively. Severe complications occurred in three patients in the hyperfractionation group and five patients in the combined-treatment group. Combined treatment for advanced head and neck cancer is more efficacious and not more toxic than hyperfractionated irradiation alone.

0 comments Cited 90 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (publisher-id): gmm

Title: Gaceta médica de México

Abbreviated Title: Gac. Méd. Méx

Publisher: Academia Nacional de Medicina de México A.C. (Ciudad de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico )

ISSN (Print): 0016-3813

ISSN (Electronic): 2696-1288

Publication date (Print and electronic): April 2006

Volume: 142

Issue: 2

Pages: 91-94

Affiliations

[03] México D. F. orgnameInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social orgdiv1Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI orgdiv2Hospital de Oncología gal@ 123456govame.com

[02] orgnameRadioterapia

[01] orgnameDepartamentos de Oncología Médica

Article

Publisher ID: S0016-38132006000200001 Publisher ID: S0016-3813(06)14200200001

SO-VID: 87c18fb6-9254-4d6f-8070-4170928fa037

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

History

Date accepted : 18 November 2005

Date received : 14 October 2005

Page count

Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 26, Pages: 4

Product

SciELO Mexico

Read this article at

Abstract

Translated abstract

Related collections

SciELO Mexico

Most cited references 30

Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer.

Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT?

Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Page count

Product

Categories

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 519

Most referenced authors 255