7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      3D-bioprinted Recombination Structure of Hertwig’s Epithelial Root Sheath Cells and Dental Papilla Cells for Alveolar Bone Regeneration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an emerging method for tissue regeneration. However, promoting the epithelial-mesenchymal interaction (EMI), while maintaining the characteristics of epithelial cells has always been a challenge in tissue engineering. Since EMI acts as a critical factor in bone regeneration, this study aims to promote EMI by recombining epithelial and mesenchymal cells through 3D bioprinting. Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath (HERS) is a transient structure appeared in the process of tooth root formation. Its epithelial characteristics are easy to attenuate under appropriate culture environment. We recombined HERS cells and dental papilla cells (DPCs) through 3D bioprinting to simulate the micro-environment of cell-cell interaction in vivo. HERS cells and DPCs were mixed with gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) separately to prepare bio-inks for bioprinting. The cells/GelMA constructs were transplanted into the alveolar socket of Sprague-Dawley rats and then observed for 8 weeks. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, Masson staining, and immunohistochemical analysis showed that dimensional cultural pattern provided ideal environment for HERS cells and DPCs to generate mineralization texture and promote alveolar bone regeneration through their interactions. 3D bioprinting technology provides a new way for the co-culture of HERS cells and DPCs and this study is inspiring for future research on EMI model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          4D Bioprinting for Biomedical Applications.

          3D bioprinting has been developed to effectively and rapidly pattern living cells and biomaterials, aiming to create complex bioconstructs. However, placing biocompatible materials or cells into direct contact via bioprinting is necessary but insufficient for creating these constructs. Therefore, '4D bioprinting' has emerged recently, where 'time' is integrated with 3D bioprinting as the fourth dimension, and the printed objects can change their shapes or functionalities when an external stimulus is imposed or when cell fusion or postprinting self-assembly occurs. In this review, we highlight recent developments in 4D bioprinting technology. Additionally, we review the uses of 4D bioprinting in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Finally, we discuss the major roadblocks to this approach, together with possible solutions, to provide future perspectives on this technology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine

            3D bioprinting is a pioneering technology that enables fabrication of biomimetic, multiscale, multi-cellular tissues with highly complex tissue microenvironment, intricate cytoarchitecture, structure-function hierarchy, and tissue-specific compositional and mechanical heterogeneity. Given the huge demand for organ transplantation, coupled with limited organ donors, bioprinting is a potential technology that could solve this crisis of organ shortage by fabrication of fully-functional whole organs. Though organ bioprinting is a far-fetched goal, there has been a considerable and commendable progress in the field of bioprinting that could be used as transplantable tissues in regenerative medicine. This paper presents a first-time review of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine, where the current status and contemporary issues of 3D bioprinting pertaining to the eleven organ systems of the human body including skeletal, muscular, nervous, lymphatic, endocrine, reproductive, integumentary, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and circulatory systems were critically reviewed. The implications of 3D bioprinting in drug discovery, development, and delivery systems are also briefly discussed, in terms of in vitro drug testing models, and personalized medicine. While there is a substantial progress in the field of bioprinting in the recent past, there is still a long way to go to fully realize the translational potential of this technology. Computational studies for study of tissue growth or tissue fusion post-printing, improving the scalability of this technology to fabricate human-scale tissues, development of hybrid systems with integration of different bioprinting modalities, formulation of new bioinks with tuneable mechanical and rheological properties, mechanobiological studies on cell-bioink interaction, 4D bioprinting with smart (stimuli-responsive) hydrogels, and addressing the ethical, social, and regulatory issues concerning bioprinting are potential futuristic focus areas that would aid in successful clinical translation of this technology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability.

              In the present study, we report on the combined efforts of material chemistry, engineering and biology as a systemic approach for the fabrication of high viability 3D printed macroporous gelatin methacrylamide constructs. First, we propose the use and optimization of VA-086 as a photo-initiator with enhanced biocompatibility compared to the conventional Irgacure 2959. Second, a parametric study on the printing of gelatins was performed in order to characterize and compare construct architectures. Hereby, the influence of the hydrogel building block concentration, the printing temperature, the printing pressure, the printing speed, and the cell density were analyzed in depth. As a result, scaffolds could be designed having a 100% interconnected pore network in the gelatin concentration range of 10-20 w/v%. In the last part, the fabrication of cell-laden scaffolds was studied, whereby the application for tissue engineering was tested by encapsulation of the hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2). Printing pressure and needle shape was revealed to impact the overall cell viability. Mechanically stable cell-laden gelatin methacrylamide scaffolds with high cell viability (>97%) could be printed. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Bioprint
                Int J Bioprint
                Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
                International Journal of Bioprinting
                Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
                2424-7723
                2424-8002
                2022
                10 June 2022
                : 8
                : 3
                : 512
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
                [2 ]National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
                [3 ]Department of Pediatric Dentistry, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
                [4 ]Department of Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
                [5 ]National Engineering Laboratory for Oral Regenerative Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
                [6 ]Engineering Research Center of Oral Translational Medicine, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
                [7 ]Chengdu Renjitiancheng Biotechnology Limited Corporation, Chengdu, China
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Weihua Guo, Department of Pedodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No.14, 3 rd Section, Renmin South Road, Chengdu 610041, PR China; guoweihua943019@163.com
                Article
                IJB-8-3-512
                10.18063/ijb.v8i3.512
                9468846
                36105141
                8749ea8b-1325-44b7-b2af-70778a66a7f7
                Copyright: © 2022 Tang, et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 February 2022
                : 20 April 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                epithelial-mesenchymal interaction,3d bioprinting,hertwig’s epithelial root sheath cell,alveolar bone regeneration

                Comments

                Comment on this article