2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Influence of St. John’s Wort on Intravenous Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Effects

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients often use complementary and alternative herbal medicines, hence, potential exists for adverse herb–drug interactions. Fentanyl is metabolized by hepatic CYP3A4 and considered transported by blood–brain barrier P-glycoprotein. Both disposition processes could be upregulated by the herbal St. John’s wort. This investigation evaluated effects of St. John’s wort on fixed-dose and apparent steady-state IV fentanyl pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects.

          Methods

          Healthy volunteers received a fentanyl fixed-dose infusion and an individually tailored target controlled infusion on separate days, before and after 30-day St. John’s wort (300 mg thrice daily; n = 8) or placebo control (n = 8) in a randomized parallel-group design. Fentanyl plasma concentrations, pupil diameter, analgesic response to experimental pain (cold pressor), subjective side effects, and cognitive effects were measured. Plasma fentanyl concentrations and changes in pupil diameter were subjected to pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling.

          Results

          St. John’s wort did not alter fentanyl pharmacokinetics. Clearance (l/min) before and after St. John’s wort (1.13 ± 0.29 and 1.24 ± 0.26, respectively) or placebo (0.96 ± 0.28 and 1.12 ± 0.27, respectively) were not different. St. John’s wort also did not affect fentanyl pharmacodynamics as measured by pupil constriction after fixed-dose and tailored fentanyl infusions. EC50 (ng/ml) was 1.1 ± 0.7 and 1.4 ± 0.9 before and after St. John’s wort versus 1.2 ± 0.8 and 1.4 ± 1.7 before and after placebo. Effect site equilibration time, T½,ke0 (min), was 12.8 ± 5.3 and 11.3 ± 6.4 before and after St. John’s wort versus 11.4 ± 6.4 and 11.1 ± 5.6 before and after placebo. St. John’s wort had no influence on analgesia, cognitive performance, or somatic cognitive–affective effects of fentanyl.

          Conclusions

          St. John’s wort did not alter fentanyl pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics or clinical effects, suggesting no effect on hepatic clearance or blood-brain barrier efflux. Patients taking St. John’s wort will likely not respond differently to IV fentanyl for anesthesia or analgesia.

          Editor’s Perspective
          What We Already Know about This Topic
          What This Article Tells Us That Is New

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

            The performance of a prediction or measurement model is often evaluated by computing the correlation coefficient and/or the regression of predictions on true (reference) values. These provide, however, only a poor description of predictive performance. The mean square prediction error (precision) and the mean prediction error (bias) provide better descriptions of predictive performance. These quantities are easily computed, and can be used to compare prediction methods to absolute standards or to one another. The measures, however, are unreliable when the reference method is imprecise. The use of these measures is discussed and illustrated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              St. John's wort induces hepatic drug metabolism through activation of the pregnane X receptor.

              St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is an herbal remedy used widely for the treatment of depression. Recent clinical studies demonstrate that hypericum extracts increase the metabolism of various drugs, including combined oral contraceptives, cyclosporin, and indinavir. In this report, we show that hyperforin, a constituent of St. John's wort with antidepressant activity, is a potent ligand (K(i) = 27 nM) for the pregnane X receptor, an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates expression of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 monooxygenase. Treatment of primary human hepatocytes with hypericum extracts or hyperforin results in a marked induction of CYP3A4 expression. Because CYP3A4 is involved in the oxidative metabolism of >50% of all drugs, our findings provide a molecular mechanism for the interaction of St. John's wort with drugs and suggest that hypericum extracts are likely to interact with many more drugs than previously had been realized.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anesthesiology
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0003-3022
                March 01 2020
                March 01 2020
                : 132
                : 3
                : 491-503
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Department of Anesthesia and Operative Services, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington (M.J.L.); the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (E.D.K); the Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.J.L., D.D.S.); and the Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Resea
                Article
                10.1097/ALN.0000000000003065
                7029805
                31794512
                872598cf-7fbc-4aab-84a2-dedbe93ef829
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article