18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reprogramming Cdr2-Dependent Geometry-Based Cell Size Control in Fission Yeast

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          How cell size is determined and maintained remains unclear, even in simple model organisms. In proliferating cells, cell size is regulated by coordinating growth and division through sizer, adder, or timer mechanisms or through some combination [ 1, 2]. Currently, the best-characterized example of sizer behavior is in fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which enters mitosis at a minimal cell size threshold. The peripheral membrane kinase Cdr2 localizes in clusters (nodes) on the medial plasma membrane and promotes mitotic entry [ 3]. Here, we show that the Cdr2 nodal density, which scales with cell size, is used by the cell to sense and control its size. By analyzing cells of different widths, we first show that cdr2 + cells divide at a fixed cell surface area. However, division in the cdr2Δ mutant is more closely specified by cell volume, suggesting that Cdr2 is essential for area sensing and supporting the existence of a Cdr2-independent secondary sizer mechanism more closely based on volume. To investigate how Cdr2 nodes may sense area, we derive a minimal mathematical model that incorporates the cytoplasmic kinase Ssp1 as a Cdr2 activator. The model predicts that a cdr2 mutant in an Ssp1 phosphorylation site ( cdr2-T166A) [ 4] should form nodes whose density registers cell length. We confirm this prediction experimentally and find that thin cells now follow this new scaling by dividing at constant length instead of area. This work supports the role of Cdr2 as a sizer factor and highlights the importance of studying geometrical aspects of size control.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Cdr2 nodal density mediates surface-area-based size control in fission yeast

          • Mathematical modeling predicts length scaling for nodal mutant Cdr2-T166A density

          • Thin cdr2-T166A cells divide using length, demonstrating size control reprogramming

          • A secondary sizer mechanism based more closely on volume is active in a cdr2 mutant

          Abstract

          By using cells of different widths, Facchetti et al. show that fission yeast size homeostasis is based on cell surface area as registered by Cdr2 nodal density. A mathematical model allows reprogramming of this Cdr2-based size regulation from area to length. Secondary size control in a cdr2 mutant more closely based on volume is also uncovered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Basic methods for fission yeast.

          The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a popular model system, and has been particularly influential in studies of the cell cycle and chromosome dynamics. Despite its differences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the tools and methods for fission yeast are conceptually similar to those used in budding yeast. Here, we present basic methods sufficient for a beginner in this system to carry out most required manipulations for genetic analysis or molecular biology. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Negative regulation of mitosis by wee1+, a gene encoding a protein kinase homolog.

            Fission yeast wee1- mutants initiate mitosis at half the cell size of wild type. The wee1+ activity is required to prevent lethal premature mitosis in cells that overproduce the mitotic inducer cdc25+. This lethal phenotype was used to clone wee1+ by complementation. When wee1+ expression is increased, mitosis is delayed until cells grow to a larger size. Thus wee1+ functions as a dose-dependent inhibitor of mitosis, the first such element to be specifically identified and cloned. The carboxy-terminal region of the predicted 112 kd wee1+ protein contains protein kinase consensus sequences, suggesting that negative regulation of mitosis involves protein phosphorylation. Genetic evidence indicates that wee1+ and cdc25+ compete in a control system regulating the cdc2+ protein kinase, which is required for mitotic initiation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nuclear size control in fission yeast

              Along-standing biological question is how a eukaryotic cell controls the size of its nucleus. We report here that in fission yeast, nuclear size is proportional to cell size over a 35-fold range, and use mutants to show that a 16-fold change in nuclear DNA content does not influence the relative size of the nucleus. Multi-nucleated cells with unevenly distributed nuclei reveal that nuclei surrounded by a greater volume of cytoplasm grow more rapidly. During interphase of the cell cycle nuclear growth is proportional to cell growth, and during mitosis there is a rapid expansion of the nuclear envelope. When the nuclear/cell (N/C) volume ratio is increased by centrifugation or genetic manipulation, nuclear growth is arrested while the cell continues to grow; in contrast, low N/C ratios are rapidly corrected by nuclear growth. We propose that there is a general cellular control linking nuclear growth to cell size.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                21 January 2019
                21 January 2019
                : 29
                : 2
                : 350-358.e4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
                [2 ]Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [3 ]Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide/CSIC/Junta de Andalucia, Seville, Spain
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author fred.chang@ 123456ucsf.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author martin.howard@ 123456jic.ac.uk
                [4]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S0960-9822(18)31649-X
                10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.017
                6345630
                30639107
                8710e4a2-3e25-4f28-932d-07c43adc3afc
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 December 2017
                : 23 October 2018
                : 10 December 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Life sciences
                cell size homeostasis,sizer control,fission yeast,cdr2,synthetic biology
                Life sciences
                cell size homeostasis, sizer control, fission yeast, cdr2, synthetic biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article