11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Identification of Acute Kidney Injury Subphenotypes with Differing Molecular Signatures and Responses to Vasopressin Therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale: Currently, no safe and effective pharmacologic interventions exist for acute kidney injury (AKI). One reason may be that heterogeneity exists within the AKI population, thereby hampering the identification of specific pathophysiologic pathways and therapeutic targets.

          Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and test whether AKI subphenotypes have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

          Methods: First, latent class analysis methodology was applied independently in two critically ill populations (discovery [ n = 794] and replication [ n = 425]) with AKI. Second, a parsimonious classification model was developed to identify AKI subphenotypes. Third, the classification model was applied to patients with AKI in VASST (Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial; n = 271), and differences in treatment response were determined. In all three populations, AKI was defined using serum creatinine and urine output.

          Measurements and Main Results: A two-subphenotype latent class analysis model had the best fit in both the discovery ( P = 0.004) and replication ( P = 0.004) AKI groups. The risk of 7-day renal nonrecovery and 28-day mortality was greater with AKI subphenotype 2 (AKI-SP2) relative to AKI subphenotype 1 (AKI-SP1). The AKI subphenotypes discriminated risk for poor clinical outcomes better than the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages of AKI. A three-variable model that included markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation accurately determined subphenotype membership (C-statistic 0.92). In VASST, vasopressin compared with norepinephrine was associated with improved 90-day mortality in AKI-SP1 (27% vs. 46%, respectively; P = 0.02), but no significant difference was observed in AKI-SP2 (45% vs. 49%, respectively; P = 0.99) and the P value for interaction was 0.05.

          Conclusions: This analysis identified two molecularly distinct AKI subphenotypes with different clinical outcomes and responses to vasopressin therapy. Identification of AKI subphenotypes could improve risk prognostication and may be useful for predictive enrichment in clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Respir Crit Care Med
          Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med
          ajrccm
          American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
          American Thoracic Society
          1073-449X
          1535-4970
          1 April 2019
          1 April 2019
          1 April 2019
          : 199
          : 7
          : 863-872
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ]Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine
          [ 2 ]Kidney Research Institute, Division of Nephrology, and
          [ 11 ]Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
          [ 3 ]Department of Sociology, and
          [ 18 ]Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
          [ 4 ]Department of Medicine
          [ 5 ]Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care
          [ 6 ]Cardiovascular Research Institute
          [ 9 ]Division of Nephrology, and
          [ 10 ]Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
          [ 7 ]Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care and
          [ 8 ]Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
          [ 12 ]University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
          [ 13 ]Centre for Heart Lung Innovation and
          [ 14 ]Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
          [ 15 ]Department of Environmental Health and
          [ 16 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and
          [ 17 ]Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
          Author notes
          Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Pavan K. Bhatraju, M.D., M.Sc., 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. E-mail: bhatraju@ 123456uw.edu .
          [*]

          J.D.C. is Associate Editor of AJRCCM. His participation complies with American Thoracic Society requirements for recusal from review and decisions for authored works.

          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-9361
          Article
          PMC6444649 PMC6444649 6444649 201807-1346OC
          10.1164/rccm.201807-1346OC
          6444649
          30334632
          86f49d65-d89d-4c56-9c44-9a4597080def
          Copyright © 2019 by the American Thoracic Society
          History
          : 20 July 2018
          : 12 October 2018
          Page count
          Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 10
          Categories
          Original Articles
          Critical Care

          acute kidney injury,mortality,endothelial dysfunction,subphenotypes

          Comments

          Comment on this article