20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychometric properties of the Persian version of bedside teaching (BST) Instrument

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Bedside teaching plays a crucial role in acquiring essential clinical skills. Therefore, the main aim of this study is assessing the validity and reliability of the Persian version of German bedside teaching (BST) instrument. This instrument was specially developed for evaluation of bedside teaching.

          Method:

          The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 last year medical students, using convenience sampling. The Persian version of the bedside teaching (BST) was used for data gathering. To calculate the reliability of the questions, Cronbach's alpha was used and to determine the construct validity of the questionnaire, confirmatory factor analysis was used. All analyses were performed in LISREL 10 and SPSS 21 software.

          Results:

          Cronbach's alpha indicated excellent reliability for each subscale (α =0.77-0.85). All of the value of the questions are more than a significant number of 1.96 and concluded to be significant. There was an acceptable fit between the hypothetical model and the data and all comparative fit indices (CFI, NFI, RFI, IFI) showed good model fitness. BST is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of clinical teaching at bedside. It has 18 items with 5 point Likert scales.

          Conclusion:

          The findings suggest that the Persian version of the BST questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of teachers and providing feedback in a clinical setting. However, more studies should be conducted in other cities in Iran.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Learning and teaching in the clinical environment.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers.

              To examine an instrument for evaluating clinical teaching using factor analysis and to refine the validated instrument to a practical length. Factor analysis on a split sample of 1,581 student evaluations rating 178 teachers. The instrument was based on the seven-category Stanford Faculty Development Program's (SFDP's) clinical teaching framework and contained 58 Likert-scaled items, with at least seven items per category plus five items measuring "teacher's knowledge." Standard methodology for survey item reduction was used to remove items with low or complex factor loadings and iteratively remove items with low item-scale correlation. Results were replicated on the second sample. The seven original categories emerged and items originally categorized under "knowledge" statistically combined with "promoting self-directed learning." Over 73% of the variance was explained. Item reduction resulted in 25 items with overall internal consistency over .97 and internal consistency of constructs ranging from .82 to .95. Factor analysis of student ratings validated the seven-category SFDP framework. An abbreviated instrument to measure the seven categories is described. Results suggest that students may not systematically distinguish between their teachers' knowledge and their teachers' ability to promote self-directed learning, an important finding for both administrators and faculty development programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Adv Med Educ Prof
                J Adv Med Educ Prof
                Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
                Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Iran )
                2322-2220
                2322-3561
                January 2021
                : 9
                : 1
                : 44-49
                Affiliations
                [1 ] MPH Department, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
                [2 ] Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
                [3 ] Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
                [4 ] Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                *Corresponding author: Mitra Amini, MD; Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Tel: (+98) 71 32333064
                Article
                JAMP-8-4
                10.30476/jamp.2020.88501.1343
                7846718
                33521140
                868f6365-7d26-4951-b245-78b295cac2bf
                Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 December 2020
                : 12 October 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                skills, reliability, medical students, factor analysis, questionnaire

                Comments

                Comment on this article