Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Non-destructive models for estimating leaf area of guava cultivars

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ABSTRACT Leaf area is a commonly used measurement in many agronomic studies, but its assessment is generally destructive, and then simple, accurate and non-destructive methods are really appreciated. The objective of this study was to develop a non-destructive model that could be used to estimate the leaf area of four guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars by using leaf linear dimensions. Leaves from guava cultivars ‘Paluma’, ‘Sassaoka’, ‘Século 21’, and ‘Tailandesa’ were sampled randomly from an experimental orchard. Leaf length and maximum leaf width were measured with a ruler in 120 leaves from each cultivar. Leaf areas were also measured with a leaf area meter. Linear and power models relating leaf area to length, width, and length × width were fitted to the data. The most precise models were regressed again with a new data set to validate the proposed models. The power model (y = 0.61 x1.06) using the length × width was more precise and accurate to estimate the leaf area of all four cultivars evaluated herein, grown in field or greenhouse conditions. When only one leaf dimension was used, the power model (y = 1.81 x1.93) using the width was the best-performing model. Although models with only one leaf dimension (length or width) have shown good performance for estimating the guava leaf area, models based on the leaf length × width were more precise.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A Simple, Cost-Effective Method for Leaf Area Estimation

          Easy, accurate, inexpensive, and nondestructive methods to determine individual leaf area of plants are a useful tool in physiological and agronomic studies. This paper introduces a cost-effective alternative (called here millimeter graph paper method) for standard electronic leaf area meter, using a millimeter graph paper. Investigations were carried out during August–October, 2009-2010, on 33 species, in the Botanical garden of the Banaras Hindu University at Varanasi, India. Estimates of leaf area were obtained by the equation, leaf area (cm2) = x / y , where x is the weight (g) of the area covered by the leaf outline on a millimeter graph paper, and y is the weight of one cm2of the same graph paper. These estimates were then compared with destructive measurements obtained through a leaf area meter; the two sets of estimates were significantly and linearly related with each other, and hence the millimeter graph paper method can be used for estimating leaf area in lieu of leaf area meter. The important characteristics of this cost-efficient technique are its easiness and suitability for precise, non-destructive estimates. This model can estimate accurately the leaf area of plants in many experiments without the use of any expensive instruments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Allometric models for non-destructive leaf area estimation in coffee (Coffea arabicaandCoffea canephora)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              R: A Language and Environment for Statisical Computing.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                brag
                Bragantia
                Bragantia
                Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (Campinas, SP, Brazil )
                0006-8705
                1678-4499
                2022
                : 81
                : e2822
                Affiliations
                [02] Campinas São Paulo orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Campinas orgdiv1Instituto de Biologia orgdiv2Departamento de Biologia Vegetal Brazil
                [01] Piracicaba orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” orgdiv2Departamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia Brazil
                Article
                S0006-87052022000100226 S0006-8705(22)08100000226
                10.1590/1678-4499.20210342
                8672e52b-304b-49a9-af16-8a0eaf636f5e

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 22 February 2022
                : 10 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 39, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Article

                allometric method,Psidium guajava,guava leaf area
                allometric method, Psidium guajava, guava leaf area

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content576

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors488