2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with dentin adhesive, glass ionomer cement and cavity varnish by means of different evaluation methods Translated title: Avaliação in vitro da microinfiltração marginal em restaurações de amálgama associadas a adesivo dentinário, cimento de ionômero de vidro e verniz cavitário, utilizando diferentes métodos de avaliação

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This in vitro study evaluated the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with the cavity varnish Copalite - Cooley & Cooley (GI-CP), dentin adhesive OptiBond Solo - Kerr (GII-OS) and the glass ionomer cement Vitremer - 3M (GIII-VT). Forty-five premolars were employed, which were submitted to independent class II preparations at the mesial and distal aspects comprising the marginal ridges and were restored with Dispersalloy - Dentsply. Afterwards, the teeth were thermocycled and stored in 0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 hours. The evaluations were conducted on a light microscope with 150x magnification and on the Sigma Scan software with employment of a single line and segmented lines. Data analysis allowed to establish that none of the materials was able to eliminate the marginal microleakage, having the GI - CP presented greater and statistically significant values in relation to the other groups in all evaluation methods (p<0.05). The lowest values were displayed by the GIII-VT, yet with no statistically significant difference when compared to GII-OS, except for the evaluation at the Sigma Scan in single line. The three evaluation methods showed a strong positive relationship to each other.

          Translated abstract

          Este trabalho avaliou, in vitro, a microinfiltração marginal de restaurações de amálgama associadas ao verniz cavitário Copalite - Cooley & Cooley (GI - CP), ao adesivo dentinário OptiBond Solo - Kerr (GII - OS) e ao CIV Vitremer - 3M (GIII - VT). Foram utilizados 45 pré-molares que receberam preparos cavitários independentes classe II nas faces mesial e distal, envolvendo as cristas marginais. Todas as cavidades foram restauradas com a liga Dispersalloy - Dentsply. Posteriormente, os dentes sofreram termociclagem e foram armazenados em solução de fucsina básica a 0,5% por 24 horas. As avaliações foram realizadas através de um microscópio óptico com aumento de 150 vezes e no software Sigma Scan, utilizando linha única e linhas segmentadas. A análise dos dados obtidos permitiu constatar que nenhum dos materiais foi capaz de eliminar a microinfiltração marginal, sendo que o GI - CP apresentou valores maiores e estatisticamente significantes (p<0,05) em relação aos demais grupos em todos os métodos de avaliação. Os menores valores foram obtidos pelo GIII - VT, porém sem diferença estatisticamente significante quando comparado ao GII - OS, exceto pela avaliação no Sigma Scan em linha única. Os três métodos de avaliação de medidas lineares empregados mostraram ter uma forte correlação positiva entre si.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Microleakage: a review.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.

            J F Roulet (1997)
            To give the practising dentist scientifically based data to assist him/her in the responsible decision-making process necessary to weigh the options available to the patient if she/he prefers not to have an amalgam placed. Based on the literature and on the research work, which was done in the author's department, the indications and limitations of the known alternatives of amalgam were formulated. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES TO AMALGAM: With the exception of cast gold restorations, all alternatives require the strict use of adhesive techniques. When compared with similar amalgam restorations, placing composite restorations (if they are indicated) takes approximately 2.5 times longer because complex incremental techniques are needed. Despite all the efforts, direct composite restorations placed in large cavities still show unacceptable amounts of marginal openings. Tooth-coloured inlays are a better alternative for large restorations. These restorations must be inserted with adhesive techniques. With composite inlays it is difficult to achieve a composite-composite bond. Ceramic inlays may be micromechanically bonded to the luting composite. They all show clinically a good marginal behaviour and the use of ultrasonic energy may further simplify the application technique of aesthetic inlays. Papers describing the different techniques were used as a base for the corresponding chapter. To assess and compare the longevity of the different restoration types, literature data were used. We limited ourselves to papers reporting at least 5-year clinical data. Longitudinal, clinically controlled studies were preferred. However, to be more complete, retrospective, cross sectional studies were also included. LONGEVITY OF POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS: Amalgam shows excellent longevity data with studies up to 20 years. The average annual failure rate is 0.3-6.9%. Posterior composites are in the same range (0.5-6.6%), however, the study times are much shorter (max. 10 years). For tooth-coloured inlays much less data are available. Longevity is reported up to 6 years with annual failure rates of 0.6-5%. All aesthetic alternatives to amalgam require more complex procedures and more time. If cost benefit considerations are a concern, amalgam is still the most convenient restorative material for posterior teeth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Durability of restorations in primary molars.

              Techniques used to restore carious primary molars have changed over the past decade as new adhesive materials have been developed. The most meaningful way of assessing the efficacy of a technique is by clinical trials. This article reviews the information concerning amalgam, composite and glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement as well as extracoronal restorations. Stainless steel/nickel chrome crowns provide the most durable restoration, often surviving until the tooth exfoliates. Class II amalgam restorations, whilst being prone to fracture, have been shown to survive about 3 years, a figure that improves with increasing age of the child and the use of local anaesthesia. Over the shorter term resin-based composites appear to be at least as durable as amalgam, particularly with respect to the maintenance of a good anatomical form. In contrast, when assessed at 6 years the failure rate of composite restorations is high, 62%, whereas the failure rate of amalgam restorations at 5 years is as low as 20%. Glass ionomer cements and cermets are alternative materials for use in the primary dentition. The reported success rate of 33% over 5 years for conventional glass ionomer cements is encouraging, however cermets appear to be less successful but have not been evaluated over the longer term. Glass ionomer cements provide a means of restoring primary molars with minimal amount of destruction of sound tooth tissue and reduced treatment time for the young patient, whilst the local fluoride release is also a potential advantage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jaos
                Journal of Applied Oral Science
                J. Appl. Oral Sci.
                Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP (Bauru, SP, Brazil )
                1678-7757
                1678-7765
                March 2005
                : 13
                : 1
                : 10-14
                Affiliations
                [01] Cascavel PR orgnameUNIOESTE orgdiv1Department of Pediatric Dentistry
                [02] orgnameUSP orgdiv1Bauru Dental School orgdiv2Department of Pediatric Dentistry
                Article
                S1678-77572005000100003 S1678-7757(05)01300103
                85fb6eb5-01a1-4904-b31a-5094c38c1aa6

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 August 2003
                : 15 December 2003
                : 09 December 2003
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Original Articles

                Dental materials,Materiais dentários,Microinfiltração marginal,Marginal microleakage

                Comments

                Comment on this article