6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of both type I–B and type II CRISPR/Cas genome editing systems in the cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The robust lignocellulose-solubilizing activity of C. thermocellum makes it a top candidate for consolidated bioprocessing for biofuel production. Genetic techniques for C. thermocellum have lagged behind model organisms thus limiting attempts to improve biofuel production. To improve our ability to engineer C. thermocellum, we characterized a native Type I–B and heterologous Type II Clustered Regularly-Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/cas (CRISPR associated) systems. We repurposed the native Type I–B system for genome editing. We tested three thermophilic Cas9 variants (Type II) and found that GeoCas9, isolated from Geobacillus stearothermophilus, is active in C. thermocellum. We employed CRISPR-mediated homology directed repair to introduce a nonsense mutation into pyrF. For both editing systems, homologous recombination between the repair template and the genome appeared to be the limiting step. To overcome this limitation, we tested three novel thermophilic recombinases and demonstrated that exo/ beta homologs, isolated from Acidithiobacillus caldus, are functional in C. thermocellum. For the Type I–B system an engineered strain, termed LL1586, yielded 40% genome editing efficiency at the pyrF locus and when recombineering machinery was expressed this increased to 71%. For the Type II GeoCas9 system, 12.5% genome editing efficiency was observed and when recombineering machinery was expressed, this increased to 94%. By combining the thermophilic CRISPR system (either Type I–B or Type II) with the recombinases, we developed a new tool that allows for efficient CRISPR editing. We are now poised to enable CRISPR technologies to better engineer C. thermocellum for both increased lignocellulose degradation and biofuel production.

          Highlights

          • The native CRISPR Type I–B system was characterized in C. thermocellum.

          • A thermophilic CRISPR-Cas9 system was demonstrated in C. thermocellum.

          • Thermophilic recombineering homologs were identified for use in C. thermocellum.

          • Thermophilic CRISPR and recombineering systems combined improved editing efficiency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing Using RNA-Guided Nucleases

          Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems have evolved in bacteria and archaea as a defense mechanism to silence foreign nucleic acids of viruses and plasmids. Recent work has shown that bacterial type II CRISPR systems can be adapted to create guide RNAs (gRNAs) capable of directing site-specific DNA cleavage by the Cas9 nuclease in vitro. Here we show that this system can function in vivo to induce targeted genetic modifications in zebrafish embryos with efficiencies comparable to those obtained using ZFNs and TALENs for the same genes. RNA-guided nucleases robustly enabled genome editing at 9 of 11 different sites tested, including two for which TALENs previously failed to induce alterations. These results demonstrate that programmable CRISPR/Cas systems provide a simple, rapid, and highly scalable method for altering genes in vivo, opening the door to using RNA-guided nucleases for genome editing in a wide range of organisms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update.

            Biologically mediated processes seem promising for energy conversion, in particular for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into fuels. Although processes featuring a step dedicated to the production of cellulase enzymes have been the focus of most research efforts to date, consolidated bioprocessing (CBP)--featuring cellulase production, cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation in one step--is an alternative approach with outstanding potential. Progress in developing CBP-enabling microorganisms is being made through two strategies: engineering naturally occurring cellulolytic microorganisms to improve product-related properties, such as yield and titer, and engineering non-cellulolytic organisms that exhibit high product yields and titers to express a heterologous cellulase system enabling cellulose utilization. Recent studies of the fundamental principles of microbial cellulose utilization support the feasibility of CBP.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

              Fundamental features of microbial cellulose utilization are examined at successively higher levels of aggregation encompassing the structure and composition of cellulosic biomass, taxonomic diversity, cellulase enzyme systems, molecular biology of cellulase enzymes, physiology of cellulolytic microorganisms, ecological aspects of cellulase-degrading communities, and rate-limiting factors in nature. The methodological basis for studying microbial cellulose utilization is considered relative to quantification of cells and enzymes in the presence of solid substrates as well as apparatus and analysis for cellulose-grown continuous cultures. Quantitative description of cellulose hydrolysis is addressed with respect to adsorption of cellulase enzymes, rates of enzymatic hydrolysis, bioenergetics of microbial cellulose utilization, kinetics of microbial cellulose utilization, and contrasting features compared to soluble substrate kinetics. A biological perspective on processing cellulosic biomass is presented, including features of pretreated substrates and alternative process configurations. Organism development is considered for "consolidated bioprocessing" (CBP), in which the production of cellulolytic enzymes, hydrolysis of biomass, and fermentation of resulting sugars to desired products occur in one step. Two organism development strategies for CBP are examined: (i) improve product yield and tolerance in microorganisms able to utilize cellulose, or (ii) express a heterologous system for cellulose hydrolysis and utilization in microorganisms that exhibit high product yield and tolerance. A concluding discussion identifies unresolved issues pertaining to microbial cellulose utilization, suggests approaches by which such issues might be resolved, and contrasts a microbially oriented cellulose hydrolysis paradigm to the more conventional enzymatically oriented paradigm in both fundamental and applied contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Metab Eng Commun
                Metab Eng Commun
                Metabolic Engineering Communications
                Elsevier
                2214-0301
                28 November 2019
                June 2020
                28 November 2019
                : 10
                : e00116
                Affiliations
                [a ]Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA
                [b ]Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA
                [c ]Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
                [d ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA
                [e ]National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Biosciences Center, Golden, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. daniel.g.olson@ 123456dartmouth.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. carrie.eckert@ 123456colorado.edu
                Article
                S2214-0301(19)30023-9 e00116
                10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00116
                6926293
                31890588
                8574b769-faa5-460c-9661-180d91e91d44

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 August 2019
                : 13 November 2019
                : 25 November 2019
                Categories
                Article

                crispr,type i–b,cas9,clostridium thermocellum,thermophilic recombineering,crispr/cas, clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat/crispr associated,sgrna, single guide rna,pam, protospacer adjacent motif,hdr, homology-directed repair,hr, homologous recombination,tm, thiamphenicol,5-foa, 5-fluoroorotic acid,cfu, colony forming unit,cas9n, nickase cas9,rnp, cas9-sgrna ribonucleoprotein

                Comments

                Comment on this article