16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Non-invasive intravital imaging of cellular differentiation with a bright red-excitable fluorescent protein

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A method for non-invasive visualization of genetically labelled cells in animal disease models with micron-level resolution would greatly facilitate development of cell-based therapies. Imaging of fluorescent proteins (FPs) using red excitation light in the “optical window” above 600 nm is one potential method for visualizing implanted cells. However, previous efforts to engineer FPs with peak excitation beyond 600 nm have resulted in undesirable reductions in brightness. Here we report three new red-excitable monomeric FPs obtained by structure-guided mutagenesis of mNeptune, previously the brightest monomeric FP when excited beyond 600 nm. Two of these, mNeptune2 and mNeptune2.5, demonstrate improved maturation and brighter fluorescence, while the third, mCardinal, has a red-shifted excitation spectrum without reduction in brightness. We show that mCardinal can be used to non-invasively and longitudinally visualize the differentiation of myoblasts and stem cells into myocytes in living mice with high anatomical detail.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficient gene transfer in C.elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences.

          We describe a dominant behavioral marker, rol-6(su-1006), and an efficient microinjection procedure which facilitate the recovery of Caenorhabditis elegans transformants. We use these tools to study the mechanism of C.elegans DNA transformation. By injecting mixtures of genetically marked DNA molecules, we show that large extrachromosomal arrays assemble directly from the injected molecules and that homologous recombination drives array assembly. Appropriately placed double-strand breaks stimulated homologous recombination during array formation. Our data indicate that the size of the assembled transgenic structures determines whether or not they will be maintained extrachromosomally or lost. We show that low copy number extrachromosomal transformation can be achieved by adjusting the relative concentration of DNA molecules in the injection mixture. Integration of the injected DNA, though relatively rare, was reproducibly achieved when single-stranded oligonucleotide was co-injected with the double-stranded DNA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins

            A variety of genetically encoded reporters use changes in fluorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) to report on biochemical processes in living cells. The standard genetically encoded FRET pair consists of cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP), but many CFP-YFP reporters suffer from low FRET dynamic range, phototoxicity from the CFP excitation light, and complex photokinetic events such as reversible photobleaching and photoconversion. Here, we engineered two fluorescent proteins, Clover and mRuby2, which are the brightest green and red fluorescent proteins to date, and have the highest Förster radius of any ratiometric FRET pair yet described. Replacement of CFP and YFP in reporters of kinase activity, small GTPase activity, and transmembrane voltage significantly improves photostability, FRET dynamic range, and emission ratio changes. These improvements enhance detection of transient biochemical events such as neuronal action potential firing and RhoA activation in growth cones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bright and stable near infra-red fluorescent protein for in vivo imaging

              The ability of non-invasive monitoring of deep-tissue developmental, metabolic, and pathogenic processes will advance modern biotechnology. Imaging of live mammals using fluorescent probes is more feasible within a “near-infrared optical window” (NIRW) 1 . Here we report a phytochrome-based near infra-red fluorescent protein (iRFP) with the excitation/emission maxima at 690/713 nm. Bright fluorescence in a living mouse proved iRFP to be a superior probe for non-invasive imaging of internal mammalian tissues. Its high intracellular stability, low cytotoxicity, and lack of the requirement to add external biliverdin-chromophore makes iRFP as easy to use as conventional GFP-like proteins. Compared to earlier phytochrome-derived fluorescent probes, the iRFP protein has better in vitro characteristics and performs well in cells and in vivo, having greater effective brightness and photostability. Compared to the far-red GFP-like proteins, iRFP has substantially higher signal to background ratio in a mouse model owing to its infra-red shifted spectra.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101215604
                32338
                Nat Methods
                Nat. Methods
                Nature methods
                1548-7091
                1548-7105
                2 April 2014
                16 March 2014
                May 2014
                01 November 2014
                : 11
                : 5
                : 572-578
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [3 ]Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [4 ]Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [5 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [6 ]Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [7 ]Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [8 ]Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
                [9 ]Department of Chemistry, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                [10 ]Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
                [11 ]National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
                [12 ]University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                [13 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to M.Z.L. ( mzlin@ 123456stanford.edu )
                Article
                NIHMS569390
                10.1038/nmeth.2888
                4008650
                24633408
                8527b9eb-1124-4d1b-aa35-5f496355b96f
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article