20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma.

          Methods

          This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery.

          Results

          No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% ( p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) ( p <  0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) ( p ≤  0.0001)).

          Conclusions

          The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma.

          Trial registration

          This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012).

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic middle ear surgery.

          One hundred sixty-five middle ear procedures were performed with an endoscope, a camera, and a video monitor instead of the microscope. The endoscope offers the following advantages: 1) it visualizes the whole tympanic membrane and the ear canal without having to manipulate the patient's head or the microscope, 2) it extends the operative field in transcanal procedures into structures usually hidden from the microscope (anterior tympanic perforation, posterior retraction pocket, facial recess, and hypotympanum), and 3) it visualizes structures from multiple angles as opposed to the microscope's single axis along the ear canal. Disadvantages of the endoscope include the one-handed surgical technique, a loss of depth perception, limited magnification, and the need for training. The endoscope holds the greatest promise in tympanoplasty and cholesteatoma surgery and should increase the utilization of transcanal over postauricular procedures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus.

            F ZOLLNER (1955)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery.

              Middle ear surgery increasingly employs endoscopes as an adjunct to or replacement for the operative microscope. We provide a systematic review of endoscope applications in middle ear surgery with an emphasis on outcomes, including the need for conversion to microscope, audiometric findings, length of follow-up, as well as disease-specific outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                iammed91@gmail.com
                drkuochinlung@gmail.com
                +886-2-27082121 , ab7801026@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
                BioMed Central (London )
                1916-0208
                1916-0216
                4 July 2018
                4 July 2018
                2018
                : 47
                : 44
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0627 9786, GRID grid.413535.5, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, , Cathay General Hospital, ; 280 Ren-Ai Rd. Sec. 4, Taipei, Taiwan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1808 2366, GRID grid.413912.c, Department of Otolaryngology, , Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, ; Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0627 9786, GRID grid.413535.5, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, , Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, ; Hsinchu, Taiwan
                Article
                289
                10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
                6033204
                29973286
                851db682-86cb-46d6-aa12-b91cd5db7614
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 August 2017
                : 25 June 2018
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                endoscopic ear surgery,microscopic,tympanoplasty,cost-efficacy

                Comments

                Comment on this article