1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diversity of social-genetic relationships in the socially monogamous pied flycatcher ( Ficedula hypoleuca) breeding in Western Siberia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We explored the genetic background of social interactions in two breeding metapopulations of the pied flycatcher ( Ficedula hypoleuca) in Western Siberia. In 2005, we sampled blood from birds breeding in study areas located in the city of Tomsk and in a natural forest 13 km southward of Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia). We sampled 30 males, 46 females, 268 nestlings (46 nests) in the urban settlement of pied flycatcher, and 232 males, 250 females, 1,485 nestlings (250 nests) in the woodland plot. DNA fingerprinting was carried out using eight microsatellite loci, which were amplified by two multiplex-PCRs and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. About 50–58% of all couples were socially and genetically monogamous in both study plots. However, almost all possible social and genetic interactions were detected for non-monogamous couples: polygamy, polyandry, helping, adoption, and egg dumping. Differences in the rate of polygyny and the rate of extra-pair paternity between both study sites could be explained by differences in environmental heterogeneity and breeding density. Our findings suggest that egg dumping, adoption, polygamy, extra pair copulation, and other types of social-genetic interactions are modifications of the monogamous social system caused by patchy environment, breeding density, and birds’ breeding status.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

          The aim of this review is to consider the potential benefits that females may gain from mating more than once in a single reproductive cycle. The relationship between non-genetic and genetic benefits is briefly explored. We suggest that multiple mating for purely non-genetic benefits is unlikely as it invariably leads to the possibility of genetic benefits as well. We begin by briefly reviewing the main models for genetic benefits to mate choice, and the supporting evidence that choice can increase offspring performance and the sexual attractiveness of sons. We then explain how multiple mating can elevate offspring fitness by increasing the number of potential sires that compete, when this occurs in conjunction with mechanisms of paternity biasing that function in copula or post-copulation. We begin by identifying cases where females use pre-copulatory cues to identify mates prior to remating. In the simplest case, females remate because they identify a superior mate and 'trade up' genetically. The main evidence for this process comes from extra-pair copulation in birds. Second, we note other cases where pre-copulatory cues may be less reliable and females mate with several males to promote post-copulatory mechanisms that bias paternity. Although a distinction is drawn between sperm competition and cryptic female choice, we point out that the genetic benefits to polyandry in terms of producing more viable or sexually attractive offspring do not depend on the exact mechanism that leads to biased paternity. Post-copulatory mechanisms of paternity biasing may: (1) reduce genetic incompatibility between male and female genetic contributions to offspring; (2) increase offspring viability if there is a positive correlation between traits favoured post-copulation and those that improve performance under natural selection; (3) increase the ability of sons to gain paternity when they mate with polyandrous females. A third possibility is that genetic diversity among offspring is directly favoured. This can be due to bet-hedging (due to mate assessment errors or temporal fluctuations in the environment), beneficial interactions between less related siblings or the opportunity to preferentially fertilise eggs with sperm of a specific genotype drawn from a range of stored sperm depending on prevailing environmental conditions. We use case studies from the social insects to provide some concrete examples of the role of genetic diversity among progeny in elevating fitness. We conclude that post-copulatory mechanisms provide a more reliable way of selecting a genetically compatible mate than pre-copulatory mate choice. Some of the best evidence for cryptic female choice by sperm selection is due to selection of more compatible sperm. Two future areas of research seem likely to be profitable. First, more experimental evidence is needed demonstrating that multiple mating increases offspring fitness via genetic gains. Second, the role of multiple mating in promoting assortative fertilization and increasing reproductive isolation between populations may help us to understand sympatric speciation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Extra-Pair Paternity in Birds: Causes, Correlates, and Conflict

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                6 December 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : e6059
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biological Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University , Moscow, Russian Federation
                [2 ]Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg, Germany
                [3 ]Zoology Museum, Tomsk State University , Tomsk, Russian Federation
                [4 ]OAG f. Populationsforschung Braunschweig , Braunschweig, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9829-5094
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-4510
                Article
                6059
                10.7717/peerj.6059
                6286800
                84dcf91a-9441-4bbc-a859-a3af4dd24fe3
                © 2018 Grinkov et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 13 March 2018
                : 4 November 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Russian Fund of Basic Research RFBR
                Award ID: projects 05-04-49173-a, 06-04-49082-a, 09-04-00162-a, 13-04-01309-a
                Funded by: State Assignment Ch. 2 CITIS AAAA-A16-116021660031-5
                Funded by: Tomsk State University competitiveness improvement programme
                This work was supported by Russian Fund of Basic Research RFBR (projects 05-04-49173-a, 06-04-49082-a, 09-04-00162-a, 13-04-01309-a), the State Assignment Ch. 2 CITIS AAAA-A16-116021660031-5, and the “Tomsk State University competitiveness improvement programme”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Zoology
                Population Biology

                extra-pair paternity,microsatellites,dna fingerprinting,social systems,monogamy,polygamy,pied flycatcher,epp,mating systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article