7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The G126S substitution in mitochondrially encoded cytochrome b does not confer bifenazate resistance in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several genetic variants of the cd1- and ef-helices of the Qo site of mitochondrial cytochrome b have been associated with bifenazate resistance in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, an important crop pest around the world. Maternal inheritance of bifenazate resistance has provided strong evidence for the involvement of many of these mutations alone or in combination. A number of populations highly resistant to bifenazate were uncovered that carried the G126S substitution in combination with other target-site mutations. This G126S mutation has therefore been investigated in several studies in the context of resistance evolution and the development of diagnostic markers. However, experimental data that link bifenazate resistance with the presence of the G126S mutation without additional cd1- and ef-helices mutations, remain very limited. Here, we genotyped 38 T. urticae field populations for cytochrome b and uncovered nine field populations with a fixed or segregating G126S substitution without other target-site mutations in the conserved cd1- and ef-helices of the cytochrome b Qo pocket. Toxicity bioassays showed that all nine field populations were very susceptible to bifenazate, providing strong evidence that G126S alone does not confer bifenazate resistance. These findings also implicate that previous T. urticae populations with G126S found to be low to moderately resistant to bifenazate, evolved alternative mechanisms of resistance, and more importantly, that this mutation cannot be used as a molecular diagnostic for bifenazate resistance.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Exp Appl Acarol
          Experimental & applied acarology
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1572-9702
          0168-8162
          Dec 2021
          : 85
          : 2-4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
          [2 ] Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
          [3 ] Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. thomas.vanleeuwen@ugent.be.
          Article
          10.1007/s10493-021-00668-6
          10.1007/s10493-021-00668-6
          34693496
          8499759f-300e-465d-b22b-0d4cac51551c
          History

          Molecular diagnostics,Qo inhibitor,Target-site resistance,Acequinocyl,Maternal inheritance

          Comments

          Comment on this article