7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Metabolism-involved drug interactions with traditional Chinese medicines in cardiovascular diseases

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Herbal medicines have been widely used for the past millennia. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a major modality in Chinese medical care and has garnered global attention owing to its pharmacological effects and multi-targeted actions. The increased incidence of sequential or concurrent use of herbs and drugs in patients forces us to consider herb–drug interactions (HDIs) in this modern era. One of the main causes of HDIs is modulation of drug metabolism, in which cytochrome P450 (CYP), UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), and transporters play primary roles. In this review, we focus on in vivo studies of HDIs, particularly in the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is currently the leading cause of disease-related mortality worldwide. A total of 55 HDIs are summarized, and their potential underlying mechanisms are examined. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of three single herbs (Danshen, Ginseng, and Ginkgo) and four compound prescriptions (Shenmai injection, Shengmai-San, Shu-Jing-Hwo-Shiee-Tang, and Wu-Chu-Yu-Tang) are discussed. Due to the complex compositions and PK/PD profiles of TCMs, the determinants of significant HDIs have been listed to further define the pros and cons of HDIs in medical care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references183

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics.

          Drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) play central roles in the metabolism, elimination and detoxification of xenobiotics and drugs introduced into the human body. Most of the tissues and organs in our body are well equipped with diverse and various DMEs including phase I, phase II metabolizing enzymes and phase III transporters, which are present in abundance either at the basal unstimulated level, and/or are inducible at elevated level after exposure to xenobiotics. Recently, many important advances have been made in the mechanisms that regulate the expression of these drug metabolism genes. Various nuclear receptors including the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), orphan nuclear receptors, and nuclear factor-erythoroid 2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) have been shown to be the key mediators of drug-induced changes in phase I, phase II metabolizing enzymes as well as phase III transporters involved in efflux mechanisms. For instance, the expression of CYP1 genes can be induced by AhR, which dimerizes with the AhR nuclear translocator (Arnt), in response to many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs). Similarly, the steroid family of orphan nuclear receptors, the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR), both heterodimerize with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), are shown to transcriptionally activate the promoters of CYP2B and CYP3A gene expression by xenobiotics such as phenobarbital-like compounds (CAR) and dexamethasone and rifampin-type of agents (PXR). The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR), which is one of the first characterized members of the nuclear hormone receptor, also dimerizes with RXR and has been shown to be activated by lipid lowering agent fibrate-type of compounds leading to transcriptional activation of the promoters on CYP4A gene. CYP7A was recognized as the first target gene of the liver X receptor (LXR), in which the elimination of cholesterol depends on CYP7A. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) was identified as a bile acid receptor, and its activation results in the inhibition of hepatic acid biosynthesis and increased transport of bile acids from intestinal lumen to the liver, and CYP7A is one of its target genes. The transcriptional activation by these receptors upon binding to the promoters located at the 5-flanking region of these CYP genes generally leads to the induction of their mRNA gene expression. The physiological and the pharmacological implications of common partner of RXR for CAR, PXR, PPAR, LXR and FXR receptors largely remain unknown and are under intense investigations. For the phase II DMEs, phase II gene inducers such as the phenolic compounds butylated hydroxyanisol (BHA), tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ), green tea polyphenol (GTP), (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and the isothiocyanates (PEITC, sulforaphane) generally appear to be electrophiles. They generally possess electrophilic-mediated stress response, resulting in the activation of bZIP transcription factors Nrf2 which dimerizes with Mafs and binds to the antioxidant/electrophile response element (ARE/EpRE) promoter, which is located in many phase II DMEs as well as many cellular defensive enzymes such as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), with the subsequent induction of the expression of these genes. Phase III transporters, for example, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs), and organic anion transporting polypeptide 2 (OATP2) are expressed in many tissues such as the liver, intestine, kidney, and brain, and play crucial roles in drug absorption, distribution, and excretion. The orphan nuclear receptors PXR and CAR have been shown to be involved in the regulation of these transporters. Along with phase I and phase II enzyme induction, pretreatment with several kinds of inducers has been shown to alter the expression of phase III transporters, and alter the excretion of xenobiotics, which implies that phase III transporters may also be similarly regulated in a coordinated fashion, and provides an important mean to protect the body from xenobiotics insults. It appears that in general, exposure to phase I, phase II and phase III gene inducers may trigger cellular "stress" response leading to the increase in their gene expression, which ultimately enhance the elimination and clearance of these xenobiotics and/or other "cellular stresses" including harmful reactive intermediates such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), so that the body will remove the "stress" expeditiously. Consequently, this homeostatic response of the body plays a central role in the protection of the body against "environmental" insults such as those elicited by exposure to xenobiotics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ABC transporters: the power to change.

            ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters constitute a ubiquitous superfamily of integral membrane proteins that are responsible for the ATP-powered translocation of many substrates across membranes. The highly conserved ABC domains of ABC transporters provide the nucleotide-dependent engine that drives transport. By contrast, the transmembrane domains that create the translocation pathway are more variable. Recent structural advances with prokaryotic ABC transporters have provided a qualitative molecular framework for deciphering the transport cycle. An important goal is to develop quantitative models that detail the kinetic and molecular mechanisms by which ABC transporters couple the binding and hydrolysis of ATP to substrate translocation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Herb-drug interactions.

              Concurrent use of herbs may mimic, magnify, or oppose the effect of drugs. Plausible cases of herb-drug interactions include: bleeding when warfarin is combined with ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba), garlic (Allium sativum), dong quai (Angelica sinensis), or danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza); mild serotonin syndrome in patients who mix St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) with serotonin-reuptake inhibitors; decreased bioavailability of digoxin, theophylline, cyclosporin, and phenprocoumon when these drugs are combined with St John's wort; induction of mania in depressed patients who mix antidepressants and Panax ginseng; exacerbation of extrapyramidal effects with neuroleptic drugs and betel nut (Areca catechu); increased risk of hypertension when tricyclic antidepressants are combined with yohimbine (Pausinystalia yohimbe); potentiation of oral and topical corticosteroids by liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra); decreased blood concentrations of prednisolone when taken with the Chinese herbal product xaio chai hu tang (sho-salko-to); and decreased concentrations of phenytoin when combined with the Ayurvedic syrup shankhapushpi. Anthranoid-containing plants (including senna [Cassia senna] and cascara [Rhamnus purshiana]) and soluble fibres (including guar gum and psyllium) can decrease the absorption of drugs. Many reports of herb-drug interactions are sketchy and lack laboratory analysis of suspect preparations. Health-care practitioners should caution patients against mixing herbs and pharmaceutical drugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Food Drug Anal
                J Food Drug Anal
                Journal of Food and Drug Analysis
                Taiwan Food and Drug Administration
                1021-9498
                2224-6614
                2014
                15 September 2022
                : 30
                : 3
                : 331-356
                Affiliations
                [a ]Medical Supplies and Maintenance, Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [b ]Graduate Institute of Medical Science, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [c ]School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [d ]Division of Basic Chinese Medicine, National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [e ]Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [f ]Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                [g ]Institute of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, No.155-1, Sec. 2, Li-Nong St., Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan, Republic of China. Fax: +886 2 28264266.
                [** ]Corresponding author at: School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, R9304, No.161, Sec. 6, Min-Chuan E. Rd., Neihu District, Taipei 114, Taiwan, Republic of China. Fax: +886 2 87924859. E-mail addresses: hongjaan@ 123456mail.ndmctsgh.edu.tw (H.-J. Wang), ueng@ 123456nricm.edu.tw (Y.-F. Ueng).
                Article
                jfda-30-03-331
                10.38212/2224-6614.3421
                9635916
                846325c6-582f-410a-827b-170cb260141c
                © 2022 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration

                This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 December 2021
                : 29 March 2022
                : 04 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
                Award ID: MOST110-2320-B-016-007
                Funded by: National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
                Award ID: MOHW110-NRICMD-325-000101
                Funded by: Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
                Award ID: HAFGH-E-109019
                This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan [MOST110-2320-B-016-007]; National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan [MOHW110-NRICMD-325-000101]; and Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan [HAFGH-E-109019].
                Categories
                Review Article

                cytochrome p450,herb-drug interaction,traditional chinese medicine,transporter,udp-glucuronosyltransferase

                Comments

                Comment on this article