Este ensaio, cuja finalidade é subsidiar a reflexão sobre a ética em pesquisa antropológica e qualitativa, busca ressaltar o caráter compreensivo, relacional e reflexivo desse processo, assim como as vantagens e os problemas que advêm das lógicas diferentes e, muitas vezes, dos interesses conflitantes entre o pesquisador e seus interlocutores. O texto se divide em quatro partes e contempla: (a) o sentido ético dessas formas de abordagem; (b) o comportamento ético do pesquisador no campo; (c) a ética na análise do material empírico; (d) cuidados éticos na elaboração dos resultados de estudos antropológicos e qualitativos, valendo-se de alguns exemplos clássicos da literatura internacional. O texto conclui refletindo sobre a distinção entre as exigências dos Comitês de Ética e a Ética da pesquisa propriamente dita: é preciso ter claro que o sentido abrangente da ética que inclui a responsabilidade do pesquisador não pode ser condensado nos instrumentos exigidos para julgamento dos projetos porque estão em jogo, além do desenvolvimento da pesquisa, o sentido social do trabalho, as relações institucionais com os financiadores, a forma de tratar a equipe de pesquisa, os estudantes nela incluídos e os compromissos com a comunidade científica.
This paper seeks to promote reflection on ethics in anthropological and qualitative research and emphasize the comprehensive, relational and reflective character of this process, as well as the advantages and problems that arise from different logic and often conflicting interests between researchers and their interlocutors. The text is divided into four parts and addresses the ethical: (a) significance of these approaches; (b) behavior of the researcher in the field; (c) analysis of the empirical material; and (d) considerations in the preparation of results of anthropological and qualitative studies, using some classic examples from the international literature. The paper concludes by reflecting on the distinction between the requirements of the Ethics Committee and the Ethics of research itself. It must be clear that the comprehensive sense of ethics which includes the responsibility of the researcher cannot be condensed in the instruments required for the judgment of projects because the following elements are involved in the development of research, namely the social significance of the work, the institutional relations with fund providers, how to treat staff and research students in academic work and commitments with the scientific community.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.